Ulf H. Schnabel

486 total citations
8 papers, 276 citations indexed

About

Ulf H. Schnabel is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ulf H. Schnabel has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 276 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 2 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ulf H. Schnabel's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers). Ulf H. Schnabel is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers). Ulf H. Schnabel collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Ulf H. Schnabel's co-authors include Matthew W. Self, Pieter R. Roelfsema, Jeannette A. M. Lorteije, Hans Op de Beeck, Sreedeep Mukherjee, Enny H. van Beest, Chris van der Togt, Areg Barsegyan, Christiaan N. Levelt and J. Alexander Heimel and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Current Biology and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Ulf H. Schnabel

8 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ulf H. Schnabel Netherlands	5	109	55	52	24	21	8	276
Seyed A. Hassani United States	8	108 1.0×	51 0.9×	137 2.6×	31 1.3×	60 2.9×	10	518
Matthew J. Boring United States	5	98 0.9×	39 0.7×	48 0.9×	13 0.5×	32 1.5×	9	314
Nguyêñ Quôć Thǎńg Vietnam	12	83 0.8×	104 1.9×	82 1.6×	87 3.6×	45 2.1×	80	640
Jiahao Ye China	8	35 0.3×	47 0.9×	106 2.0×	12 0.5×	29 1.4×	20	285
Benjamin Tsang Canada	11	49 0.4×	38 0.7×	53 1.0×	10 0.4×	7 0.3×	29	360
Loren Koçillari Italy	5	68 0.6×	18 0.3×	35 0.7×	10 0.4×	17 0.8×	7	236
Joshua Morgan United States	7	70 0.6×	120 2.2×	102 2.0×	8 0.3×	18 0.9×	16	309
Laura Wisby United Kingdom	4	25 0.2×	20 0.4×	59 1.1×	10 0.4×	15 0.7×	4	262
Elba E. Serrano United States	11	56 0.5×	102 1.9×	213 4.1×	14 0.6×	23 1.1×	30	431
Fan Fei China	8	21 0.2×	84 1.5×	68 1.3×	12 0.5×	35 1.7×	21	297

Countries citing papers authored by Ulf H. Schnabel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ulf H. Schnabel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ulf H. Schnabel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ulf H. Schnabel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ulf H. Schnabel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ulf H. Schnabel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ulf H. Schnabel. The network helps show where Ulf H. Schnabel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ulf H. Schnabel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ulf H. Schnabel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ulf H. Schnabel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ulf H. Schnabel. Ulf H. Schnabel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Beest, Enny H. van, Sreedeep Mukherjee, Ulf H. Schnabel, et al.. (2021). Mouse visual cortex contains a region of enhanced spatial resolution. Nature Communications. 12(1). 4029–4029. 25 indexed citations

2.

Mukherjee, Sreedeep, Ulf H. Schnabel, Enny H. van Beest, et al.. (2021). The essential role of recurrent processing for figure-ground perception in mice. Science Advances. 7(27). 38 indexed citations

3.

Wacongne, Catherine, et al.. (2021). A neuronal basis of iconic memory in macaque primary visual cortex. Current Biology. 31(24). 5401–5414.e4. 16 indexed citations

4.

Schnabel, Ulf H., et al.. (2021). A Direct Comparison of Spatial Attention and Stimulus–Response Compatibility between Mice and Humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 33(5). 771–783. 2 indexed citations

5.

Mukherjee, Sreedeep, Ulf H. Schnabel, Chris van der Togt, et al.. (2020). Mouse visual cortex contains a region of enhanced spatial resolution. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations

6.

Beest, Enny H. van, Sreedeep Mukherjee, Ulf H. Schnabel, et al.. (2019). A Fovea-Like Representation of Space in Mouse Visual Cortex. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

7.

Schnabel, Ulf H., et al.. (2018). Figure-ground perception in the awake mouse and neuronal activity elicited by figure-ground stimuli in primary visual cortex. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 17800–17800. 186 indexed citations

8.

Schnabel, Ulf H., et al.. (2012). Electromagnetic tracking of motion in the proximity of computer generated graphical stimuli: A tutorial. Behavior Research Methods. 45(3). 696–701. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact