Jason D. Averill
About
In The Last Decade
Jason D. Averill
25 papers receiving 415 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Ocean Engineering 339
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 223
- Transportation 109
- Control and Systems Engineering 86
- Sociology and Political Science 48
Countries citing papers authored by Jason D. Averill
This map shows the geographic impact of Jason D. Averill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jason D. Averill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jason D. Averill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jason D. Averill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jason D. Averill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jason D. Averill. The network helps show where Jason D. Averill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jason D. Averill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jason D. Averill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jason D. Averill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jason D. Averill. Jason D. Averill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | Analysis of Egress From the World Trade Center Towers on September 11, 2001 | 0 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 213 | |
| 7 | Report on Residential Fireground Field Experiments | 7 |
| 8 | Rethinking Egress: A Vision for the Future | NIST | 1 |
| 9 | Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster (NIST NCSTAR 1A) ***DRAFT for Public Comments*** | 3 |
| 10 | Assessing the Accuracy of a Physical Fire Model for Obtaining Smoke Toxic Potency Data. | NIST | 1 |
| 11 | Occupant Behavior, Egress, and Emergency Communication. Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster (NIST NCSTAR 1-7) | NIST | 75 |
| 12 | Occupant Behavior, Egress, and Emergency Communication. Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster (NIST NCSTAR 1-7) ***DRAFT for Public Comments*** | NIST | 5 |
| 13 | Final Report of the National Construction Safety Team on the Collapses of the World Trade Center Towers. Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigations of the World Trade Center Disaster (NIST NCSTAR 1) ***DRAFT for Public Comments*** | 15 |
| 14 | Fire Safety of Passenger Trains. Phase 3. Evaluation of Fire Hazard Analysis Using Full-Scale Passenger Rail Car Tests (NISTIR 6563) | NIST | 10 |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | Occupant Behavior, Egress, and Emergency Communications. World Trade Center Investigation Status. | 1 |
| 17 | Home Smoke Alarm Project, Manufactured Home Tests. Report of Test FR 4016. | NIST | 1 |
| 18 | Evaluating Multi-Sensor Fire Detectors in the Fire Emulator/Detector Evaluator | NIST | 4 |
| 19 | Performance-Based Codes: Economics, Documentation, and Design | 8 |
| 20 | Development of a Hazard-Based Method for Evaluating the Fire Safety of Passenger Trains (NISTIR 6588) | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.