Janis Fook

762 citations
7 papers · 442 indexed · h-index 5
Topics
Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers)Evaluation of Teaching Practices (1 paper)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1 paper)
Journals
Reflective PracticeePrints Soton (University of Southampton)Research Repository (Kingston University London)

In The Last Decade

Janis Fook

7 papers receiving 405 citations

Peers

Janis Fook
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Public Administration 275
  • General Health Professions 233
  • Education 139
  • Clinical Psychology 89
  • Sociology and Political Science 88
Replace Mark Doel with:
Mark Doel United Kingdom
Jane Maidment Australia
Gurid Aga Askeland Norway
Narda Razack Canada
Phyllida Parsloe United Kingdom
Michelle Lefevre United Kingdom
Gai Harrison Australia
Carolyn Noble Australia
Roy Ruckdeschel United States
Gordon Jack United Kingdom
Janis Fook relative to Mark Doel United Kingdom Mark Doel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Mark Doel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janis Fook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janis Fook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janis Fook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janis Fook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janis Fook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janis Fook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janis Fook. The network helps show where Janis Fook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janis Fook

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janis Fook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janis Fook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janis Fook. Janis Fook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 10
2
Practising Critical Reflection: A Resource Handbook
237
3
Empowerment : a contextual perspective
10
4
Challenges and directions for critical social work.
2
5
Social Work: A Critical Turn
80
6
From Dilemma to Breakthrough
2
7
Radical casework a theory of practice
101

About Janis Fook

Janis Fook is a scholar working on Public Administration, Research and Theory and General Health Professions, having authored 7 papers that have together received 442 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (1 paper) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (275 citations), General Health Professions (233 citations) and Education (139 citations). Janis Fook has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Fiona Gardner, Richard Pozzuto, Steven Hick, Christine Morley and Jonathan Glazzard. Their work appears in journals such as Reflective Practice, ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) and Research Repository (Kingston University London).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026