Janina Lüscher
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Physiology
- Social Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Urte ScholzCorina BerliGertraud StadlerNina KnollRainer HornungSibylle OchsnerAleksandra ŁuszczyńskaRalf Schwarzer
- Topics
- Behavioral Health and Interventions (24 papers)Smoking Behavior and Cessation (9 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Janina Lüscher
41 papers receiving 416 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Applied Psychology 194
- Physiology 126
- Social Psychology 121
- General Health Professions 98
- Clinical Psychology 87
Countries citing papers authored by Janina Lüscher
This map shows the geographic impact of Janina Lüscher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janina Lüscher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janina Lüscher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janina Lüscher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janina Lüscher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janina Lüscher. The network helps show where Janina Lüscher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janina Lüscher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janina Lüscher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janina Lüscher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janina Lüscher. Janina Lüscher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 30 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | Social exchange processes and their association with couples’ health regulation and health-related outcomes | 1 |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | Examining invisible social control as predictor of daily smoking and negative affect after a self-set quit date | 1 |
| 20 | 23 |
About Janina Lüscher
Janina Lüscher is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (24 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (9 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (194 citations), Health (66 citations) and Social Psychology (121 citations). Janina Lüscher has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Urte Scholz, Corina Berli, Gertraud Stadler, Nina Knoll, Rainer Hornung, Sibylle Ochsner, Aleksandra Łuszczyńska, Ralf Schwarzer, Diana Hilda Hohl and Tobias Kowatsch. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Social Science & Medicine and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.