Janice Nickson

805 total citations
7 papers, 555 citations indexed

About

Janice Nickson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Janice Nickson has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 555 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Spectroscopy and 2 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in Janice Nickson's work include Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (4 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers). Janice Nickson is often cited by papers focused on Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (4 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers). Janice Nickson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Germany. Janice Nickson's co-authors include Rachel Rowlinson, Robert Tonge, Joanne Shaw, Alison Sweet, Ian D. Wilson, Elaine Holmes, Jeremy K. Nicholson, David Jackson, Robert W. Wilkinson and James E. Sidaway and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Cancer Research, Journal of Proteome Research and Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

In The Last Decade

Janice Nickson

7 papers receiving 543 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Janice Nickson United Kingdom	6	395	254	50	39	37	7	555
Keun Na South Korea	14	356 0.9×	126 0.5×	64 1.3×	31 0.8×	88 2.4×	25	624
Catharina Crone Germany	5	392 1.0×	338 1.3×	36 0.7×	35 0.9×	32 0.9×	7	623
Navin Rauniyar United States	11	498 1.3×	183 0.7×	68 1.4×	37 0.9×	49 1.3×	24	714
Stephen C. Brown United States	9	550 1.4×	131 0.5×	39 0.8×	37 0.9×	29 0.8×	11	737
György Marko‐Varga Sweden	11	273 0.7×	258 1.0×	35 0.7×	14 0.4×	31 0.8×	26	520
Sankha S. Basu United States	18	457 1.2×	174 0.7×	100 2.0×	46 1.2×	48 1.3×	34	769
Jih‐Lie Tseng United States	13	248 0.6×	91 0.4×	34 0.7×	13 0.3×	38 1.0×	26	569
Ty M. Thomson Switzerland	9	409 1.0×	234 0.9×	50 1.0×	17 0.4×	20 0.5×	12	590
David Pirman United States	11	428 1.1×	296 1.2×	149 3.0×	16 0.4×	90 2.4×	18	749
Leo E. Bonilla United States	12	426 1.1×	262 1.0×	60 1.2×	18 0.5×	44 1.2×	13	659

Countries citing papers authored by Janice Nickson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice Nickson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice Nickson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice Nickson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice Nickson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice Nickson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice Nickson. The network helps show where Janice Nickson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janice Nickson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janice Nickson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janice Nickson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janice Nickson. Janice Nickson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Prime, John E., Louise Unwin, Jill V. Hunter, et al.. (2009). Abstract A119: A proteomics-based approach to identify biomarker profiles of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) in breast cancer cell lines. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 8(12_Supplement). A119–A119. 2 indexed citations

2.

Jackson, David, Rachel A. Craven, Richard Hutson, et al.. (2007). Proteomic Profiling Identifies Afamin as a Potential Biomarker for Ovarian Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research. 13(24). 7370–7379. 82 indexed citations

3.

Jackson, David, Rachel Rowlinson, Janice Nickson, et al.. (2006). Prostatic tissue protein alterations due to delayed time to freezing. PROTEOMICS. 6(13). 3901–3908. 20 indexed citations

4.

Rantalainen, Mattias, Olivier Cloarec, Olaf Beckonert, et al.. (2006). Statistically Integrated Metabonomic−Proteomic Studies on a Human Prostate Cancer Xenograft Model in Mice. Journal of Proteome Research. 5(10). 2642–2655. 118 indexed citations

5.

Sidaway, James E., Elaine Holmes, Terry C. Orton, et al.. (2006). Systems Toxicology: Integrated Genomic, Proteomic and Metabonomic Analysis of Methapyrilene Induced Hepatotoxicity in the Rat. Journal of Proteome Research. 5(7). 1586–1601. 98 indexed citations

6.

Smith, Graeme, Derek Barratt, Rachel Rowlinson, Janice Nickson, & Robert Tonge. (2005). Development of a high‐throughput method for preparing human urine for two‐dimensional electrophoresis. PROTEOMICS. 5(9). 2315–2318. 35 indexed citations

7.

Shaw, Joanne, et al.. (2003). Evaluation of saturation labelling two‐dimensional difference gel electrophoresis fluorescent dyes. PROTEOMICS. 3(7). 1181–1195. 200 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact