Janice M. Hickman

590 total citations
7 papers, 431 citations indexed

About

Janice M. Hickman is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Janice M. Hickman has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 431 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Insect Science, 6 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 3 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Janice M. Hickman's work include Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers). Janice M. Hickman is often cited by papers focused on Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers). Janice M. Hickman collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Janice M. Hickman's co-authors include S. D. Wratten, Jason M. Tylianakis, Michael H. Bowie, J. R. Sedcole, A. M. Evans, Gábor L. Löveï, Alan MacLeod, P. C. Jepson, Chris Frampton and R. L. Day and has published in prestigious journals such as Oecologia, Journal of Economic Entomology and Basic and Applied Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Janice M. Hickman

7 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Janice M. Hickman United Kingdom	6	320	319	177	100	78	7	431
Andrew Corbett United States	9	331 1.0×	409 1.3×	240 1.4×	85 0.8×	87 1.1×	11	527
Barbara Randlkofer Germany	7	237 0.7×	193 0.6×	155 0.9×	107 1.1×	70 0.9×	7	323
Kimiora L. Ward United States	7	337 1.1×	229 0.7×	221 1.2×	130 1.3×	64 0.8×	10	420
Lisa A. Berndt New Zealand	11	277 0.9×	452 1.4×	236 1.3×	55 0.6×	111 1.4×	25	539
Annette Heisswolf Finland	10	214 0.7×	201 0.6×	120 0.7×	104 1.0×	114 1.5×	13	339
Sebastian Haenke Germany	4	402 1.3×	343 1.1×	253 1.4×	149 1.5×	64 0.8×	4	512
Ann Finley Wright United Kingdom	7	149 0.5×	199 0.6×	125 0.7×	51 0.5×	47 0.6×	9	279
Lucie Raymond France	8	198 0.6×	222 0.7×	115 0.6×	42 0.4×	49 0.6×	8	290
Sandra Öberg Sweden	7	195 0.6×	213 0.7×	75 0.4×	77 0.8×	73 0.9×	11	320
Aline Boursault France	4	238 0.7×	267 0.8×	298 1.7×	136 1.4×	78 1.0×	4	478

Countries citing papers authored by Janice M. Hickman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice M. Hickman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice M. Hickman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice M. Hickman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice M. Hickman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice M. Hickman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice M. Hickman. The network helps show where Janice M. Hickman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janice M. Hickman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janice M. Hickman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janice M. Hickman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janice M. Hickman. Janice M. Hickman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Day, R. L., et al.. (2015). Predatory hoverflies increase oviposition in response to colour stimuli offering no reward: Implications for biological control. Basic and Applied Ecology. 16(6). 544–552. 11 indexed citations

2.

Wratten, S. D., Michael H. Bowie, Janice M. Hickman, et al.. (2003). Field boundaries as barriers to movement of hover flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in cultivated land. Oecologia. 134(4). 605–611. 160 indexed citations

3.

Hickman, Janice M., S. D. Wratten, P. C. Jepson, & Chris Frampton. (2001). Effect of hunger on yellow water trap catches of hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae) adults. Agricultural and Forest Entomology. 3(1). 35–40. 24 indexed citations

4.

Löveï, Gábor L., Alan MacLeod, & Janice M. Hickman. (1998). Dispersal and effects of barriers on the movement of the New Zealand hover fly Melanostoma fasciatum (Dipt., Syrphidae) on cultivated land. Journal of Applied Entomology. 122(1-5). 115–120. 26 indexed citations

5.

Hickman, Janice M. & S. D. Wratten. (1996). Use of Phelia tanacetifolia Strips To Enhance Biological Control of Aphids by Overfly Larvae in Cereal Fields. Journal of Economic Entomology. 89(4). 832–840. 164 indexed citations

6.

Hickman, Janice M., Gábor L. Löveï, & S. D. Wratten. (1995). Pollen feeding by adults of the hoverfly Melanostoma fasciatum (Diptera: Syrphidae). New Zealand Journal of Zoology. 22(4). 387–392. 42 indexed citations

7.

Hickman, Janice M. & S. D. Wratten. (1994). Use of Phacelia tanacetifolia (Hydrophyllaceae) as a pollen resource to enhance hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae) populations in sweetcorn fields.. 17(4). 156–167. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact