Janice Keefe

88 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Janice Keefe
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • General Health Professions 891
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 51
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 122
  • Health 237
  • Demography 299
Replace Paula Carder with:
Paula Carder United States
Kimberly D. Fraser Canada
Ann‐Marie Towers United Kingdom
William T. Gallo United States
Charlotte Clarke United Kingdom
James H. Swan United States
Christine E. Bishop United States
Cynthia M. Cready United States
Laura Funk Canada
Renée R. Shield United States
Janice Keefe relative to Paula Carder United States Paula Carder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Paula Carder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janice Keefe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice Keefe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice Keefe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice Keefe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice Keefe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice Keefe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice Keefe. The network helps show where Janice Keefe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janice Keefe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janice Keefe Line = papers co-authored together Janice Keefe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20250
3 20241
4 20232
5 202312
6 20231
7 20234
8 20231
9 202212
10 20226
11
Do Interventions Reducing Social Vulnerability Improve Health in Community Dwelling Older Adults? A Systematic Review
202222
12 202114
13 202169
14 20189
15 201715
16
The Becoming Subject of Dementia
20165
17 201214
18 200723
19 200620
20
Developing New Strategies to Support Future Caregivers of the Aged in Canada: Projections of Need and their Policy Implications
200511

About Janice Keefe

Janice Keefe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health, Demography, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (59 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (26 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (22 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (22 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (15 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (10 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (891 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (51 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (122 citations), Health (237 citations) and Demography (299 citations). Janice Keefe has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Melissa K. Andrew, Pamela Fancey, Anne Martin-Matthews, Carole A. Estabrooks, Carolyn J. Rosenthal, Jacques Légaré, Kenneth Rockwood, Nancy Guberman, Jasmine Mah and Sharon E. Straus. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, BMC Geriatrics, Implementation Science, Journal of Applied Gerontology and Innovation in Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026