Janet Radcliffe Richards

20 papers receiving 193 citations

Peers

Janet Radcliffe Richards
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 92
  • Sociology and Political Science 46
  • Political Science and International Relations 28
  • General Health Professions 28
  • Clinical Psychology 26
Replace Sherine Hamdy with:
Sherine Hamdy United States
Sheelagh McGuinness United Kingdom
James M. Humber United States
Paul M. Hughes United States
Leslie Cannold Australia
Rosamund Scott United Kingdom
Ebrahim Moosa United States
Thomas A. Shannon United States
Anna Sofie Bach Denmark
Sabine Wöhlke Germany
Janet Radcliffe Richards relative to Sherine Hamdy United States Sherine Hamdy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sherine Hamdy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Radcliffe Richards

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Radcliffe Richards's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Radcliffe Richards with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Radcliffe Richards more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Radcliffe Richards

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Radcliffe Richards. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Radcliffe Richards. The network helps show where Janet Radcliffe Richards may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Radcliffe Richards

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Radcliffe Richards. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Radcliffe Richards based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Radcliffe Richards. Janet Radcliffe Richards is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Only X%: The Problem of Sex Equality
2
2
Careless Thought Costs Lives: The Ethics of Transplants
2
3
Human Nature After Darwin: A Philosophical Introduction
9
4 0
5
Organs for sale.
12
6 12
7 2
8
How not to end disability.
3
9 1
10 15
11 74
12 1
13 3
14 6
15 1
16
Organ transplants. Coping mechanisms.
5
17 0
18 1
19 37
20
The Sceptical Feminist: A Philosophical Enquiry
31

About Janet Radcliffe Richards

Janet Radcliffe Richards is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Transplantation and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 23 papers that have together received 235 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Donation and Transplantation (6 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers) and Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (20 citations), General Psychology (4 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (92 citations). Janet Radcliffe Richards has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Antony Flew, Margaret Lock, Sujit Choudhry, R A Sells, Nicholas L. Tilney, Abdallah S. Daar, Guttmann Rd, Martin Bobrow and Wallace Feurzeig. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Nature Medicine and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026