Janet Parkosewich

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
25 papers, 892 citations indexed

About

Janet Parkosewich is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet Parkosewich has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 892 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 5 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology. Recurrent topics in Janet Parkosewich's work include Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (5 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (4 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers). Janet Parkosewich is often cited by papers focused on Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (5 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (4 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers). Janet Parkosewich collaborates with scholars based in United States. Janet Parkosewich's co-authors include Robert L. McNamara, Sarah A. Roumanis, Barbara Barton, Tashonna R. Webster, Jennifer A. Mattera, Harlan M. Krumholz, Elizabeth H. Bradley, Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Yongfei Wang and Jerod M. Loeb and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration.

In The Last Decade

Janet Parkosewich

25 papers receiving 856 citations

Hit Papers

Strategies for Reducing t... 2006 2026 2012 2019 2006 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janet Parkosewich United States 7 624 331 182 171 132 25 892
Barbara Barton United States 9 737 1.2× 386 1.2× 205 1.1× 198 1.2× 278 2.1× 17 1.2k
Bimal R. Shah United States 19 761 1.2× 163 0.5× 218 1.2× 207 1.2× 190 1.4× 46 1.2k
Erik Youngson Canada 17 533 0.9× 256 0.8× 145 0.8× 39 0.2× 153 1.2× 68 987
Frank D. Sites United States 16 673 1.1× 283 0.9× 164 0.9× 410 2.4× 151 1.1× 32 1.1k
Claire C. Corbett United States 15 397 0.6× 497 1.5× 133 0.7× 83 0.5× 35 0.3× 21 784
Joshua M. Kosowsky United States 17 309 0.5× 409 1.2× 90 0.5× 212 1.2× 112 0.8× 47 907
Carolyn Astley Australia 16 749 1.2× 70 0.2× 120 0.7× 199 1.2× 159 1.2× 56 929
Jacob A. Doll United States 17 558 0.9× 125 0.4× 300 1.6× 182 1.1× 79 0.6× 56 888
André Ferland Canada 11 376 0.6× 96 0.3× 240 1.3× 69 0.4× 61 0.5× 19 814
Judith M. Poldervaart Netherlands 10 553 0.9× 184 0.6× 65 0.4× 303 1.8× 81 0.6× 21 740

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Parkosewich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Parkosewich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Parkosewich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Parkosewich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Parkosewich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Parkosewich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Parkosewich. The network helps show where Janet Parkosewich may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Parkosewich

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Parkosewich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Parkosewich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Parkosewich. Janet Parkosewich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Roney, Linda, et al.. (2024). Caring through crisis: The professional quality of pediatric nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 78. e306–e313. 1 indexed citations
2.
Iennaco, Joanne, et al.. (2023). The Aggressive Incidents in Medical Settings (AIMS) Study: Advancing Measurement to Promote Prevention of Workplace Violence. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 50(3). 166–176. 4 indexed citations
3.
Parkosewich, Janet, et al.. (2022). The Effect of an Educational Intervention on Nurses’ Knowledge, Perception, and Use of Nursing Presence in the Perioperative Setting. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing. 38(2). 305–311. 3 indexed citations
4.
Knobf, M. Tish, et al.. (2022). A Focus Group Study of Retirement-Age Nurses: Balancing Tension and a Love of Nursing in a Changing Healthcare Environment. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 52(12). 646–652. 5 indexed citations
5.
Cooper, Dawn, et al.. (2021). Nurses’ Perceptions of Barriers to Out-of-Bed Activities Among Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation. American Journal of Critical Care. 30(4). 266–274. 7 indexed citations
6.
7.
Parkosewich, Janet, et al.. (2020). Safety and Effectiveness of Early Oral Hydration in Patients After Cardiothoracic Surgery. American Journal of Critical Care. 29(4). 292–300. 13 indexed citations
8.
Parkosewich, Janet, et al.. (2020). “Finding the Balance”: A Qualitative Study of the Experience of Nurses and Patients with Diabetes on an Insulin Pump in the Hospital. The Diabetes Educator. 46(6). 587–596. 4 indexed citations
10.
Parkosewich, Janet, et al.. (2019). Incidence, Timing, and Factors Associated with Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing. 34(6). 1146–1155. 6 indexed citations
11.
12.
Scanlon, Mary, et al.. (2017). Perceptions of Adult Hospitalized Patients on Family Presence During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. American Journal of Critical Care. 26(2). 103–110. 23 indexed citations
13.
Parkosewich, Janet. (2013). An infrastructure to advance the scholarly work of staff nurses.. PubMed. 86(1). 63–77. 2 indexed citations
14.
Rao, Veena, et al.. (2009). Improvements in Time to Reperfusion. Critical Pathways in Cardiology A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine. 8(1). 38–42. 3 indexed citations
15.
Parkosewich, Janet. (2007). Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers and Opportunities Among Women With Cardiovascular Disease. Cardiology in Review. 16(1). 36–52. 39 indexed citations
16.
Bradley, Elizabeth H., Jeph Herrin, Yongfei Wang, et al.. (2006). Strategies for Reducing the Door-to-Balloon Time in Acute Myocardial Infarction. New England Journal of Medicine. 355(22). 2308–2320. 604 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Parkosewich, Janet, Marjorie Funk, & Elizabeth H. Bradley. (2005). Applying Five Key Success Factors to Optimize the Quality of Care for Patients Hospitalized With Coronary Artery Disease. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing. 20(3). 111–116. 6 indexed citations
18.
Parkosewich, Janet, et al.. (2005). Women's Heart Advantage Program: the impact 3 years later.. PubMed. 16(4). 27–34. 2 indexed citations
19.
Bradley, Elizabeth H., Sarah A. Roumanis, Martha J. Radford, et al.. (2005). Achieving Door-to-Balloon Times That Meet Quality Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 46(7). 1236–1241. 149 indexed citations
20.
Gombeski, William R., et al.. (2002). Women's Heart Advantage program: motivating rapid and assertive behavior.. PubMed. 13(5). 21–8. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026