Jane Dixon

5.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
104 papers, 3.6k citations indexed

About

Jane Dixon is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Dixon has authored 104 papers receiving a total of 3.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in General Health Professions, 22 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 17 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Jane Dixon's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (7 papers) and Diabetes Management and Education (6 papers). Jane Dixon is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (11 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (7 papers) and Diabetes Management and Education (6 papers). Jane Dixon collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Jane Dixon's co-authors include Wantana Maneesriwongul, Margaret Grey, Robin Whittemore, Kathleen A. Knafl, Agatha M. Gallo, Janet A. Deatrick, Ruth McCorkle, Marie Bakitas, Allen Hsiao and George J. Knafl and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Environmental Science & Technology.

In The Last Decade

Jane Dixon

102 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Hit Papers

Instrument translation process: a methods review 2004 2026 2011 2018 2004 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Dixon United States 29 917 834 801 516 495 104 3.6k
Päivi Åstedt‐Kurki Finland 36 1.0k 1.1× 1.5k 1.8× 999 1.2× 756 1.5× 560 1.1× 173 3.8k
Karen Willis Australia 32 1.5k 1.7× 819 1.0× 602 0.8× 553 1.1× 310 0.6× 143 3.7k
Stephen R. Marrone United States 9 1.1k 1.2× 530 0.6× 619 0.8× 438 0.8× 350 0.7× 21 3.2k
Adriaan Visser Netherlands 37 1.4k 1.5× 508 0.6× 1.0k 1.3× 472 0.9× 515 1.0× 144 4.1k
Karin Dahlberg Sweden 37 1.5k 1.6× 1.1k 1.3× 940 1.2× 681 1.3× 350 0.7× 88 4.5k
Reza Negarandeh Iran 33 1.2k 1.3× 659 0.8× 528 0.7× 461 0.9× 260 0.5× 220 3.2k
Tumaini R. Coker United States 38 1.3k 1.5× 1.3k 1.5× 820 1.0× 453 0.9× 695 1.4× 146 4.7k
Saharnaz Nedjat Iran 35 1.3k 1.5× 675 0.8× 1.0k 1.3× 463 0.9× 419 0.8× 288 4.5k
Mark Hayter United Kingdom 32 977 1.1× 612 0.7× 443 0.6× 352 0.7× 214 0.4× 157 2.9k
Moon Fai Chan Oman 43 1.2k 1.3× 792 0.9× 667 0.8× 449 0.9× 329 0.7× 215 4.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Dixon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Dixon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Dixon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Dixon. The network helps show where Jane Dixon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Dixon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Dixon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Dixon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Dixon. Jane Dixon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dixon, Jane & Mark Lazenby. (2023). Expert Panel Content Validation for Evidence-Based Projects: Adaptation of the Content Validity Index. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
2.
Dixon, Jane, et al.. (2021). Individualized Board Match Counseling: Connecting Nurses to Nonprofit Board Service. 39(6). 285–285. 2 indexed citations
3.
Sharma, Manu, Jane Dixon, Eileen Carter, & Ruth McCorkle. (2018). Essential evidence-based introductory bioterrorism content for practicing nurses. Nurse Education in Practice. 34. 104–110. 4 indexed citations
4.
Sadler, Lois S., et al.. (2018). The Development and Validation of an Acuity Tool in a Pediatric Outpatient Burn Clinic. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 48(7/8). 375–382. 1 indexed citations
5.
Knafl, George J., Kathleen A. Knafl, Margaret Grey, et al.. (2017). Incorporating nonlinearity into mediation analyses. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 17(1). 45–45. 7 indexed citations
6.
Jones, Elizabeth W., et al.. (2016). Nutrition and Other Protective Behaviors Motivated by Environmental Health Risk Awareness. PubMed. 10(1). 1–12. 1 indexed citations
7.
Williams, Anna-leila, et al.. (2013). Factors associated with depressive symptoms in cancer family caregivers of patients receiving chemotherapy. Supportive Care in Cancer. 21(9). 2387–2394. 22 indexed citations
8.
Knafl, Kathleen A., Janet A. Deatrick, George J. Knafl, et al.. (2013). Patterns of Family Management of Childhood Chronic Conditions and Their Relationship to Child and Family Functioning. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 28(6). 523–535. 90 indexed citations
9.
Caplan, Susan, Jennifer Alvidrez, Manuel Paris, et al.. (2010). Subjective Versus Objective. The Primary Care Companion to The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 12(5). 11 indexed citations
10.
Knafl, Kathleen A., Janet A. Deatrick, Agatha M. Gallo, et al.. (2009). Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Family Management Measure. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 36(5). 494–505. 143 indexed citations
11.
Dixon, Jane, et al.. (2009). The Environmental Health Engagement Profile: What People Think and Do About Environmental Health. Public Health Nursing. 26(5). 460–473. 31 indexed citations
12.
Liu, Shan, Jane Dixon, Guang Qiu, Yu Tian, & Ruth McCorkle. (2009). Using Generalized Estimating Equations to Analyze Longitudinal Data in Nursing Research. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 31(7). 948–964. 19 indexed citations
13.
Dixon, Jane. (2008). Missing Data: A Gentle Introduction. Journal of Official Statistics. 24(2). 325–327. 1 indexed citations
14.
Whittemore, Robin & Jane Dixon. (2008). Chronic illness: the process of integration. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 17(7b). 177–187. 127 indexed citations
15.
Schilling, Lynne S., et al.. (2007). Determining Content Validity of a Self-Report Instrument for Adolescents Using a Heterogeneous Expert Panel. Nursing Research. 56(5). 361–366. 76 indexed citations
16.
Olsen, Douglas P., et al.. (2005). Privacy Concerns of Patients and Nurse Practitioners in Primary Care—An APRNet Study. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 17(12). 527–534. 16 indexed citations
17.
Dixon, Jane, et al.. (2002). An Integrative Model for Environmental Health Research. Advances in Nursing Science. 24(3). 43–57. 31 indexed citations
18.
Dixon, Jane. (2002). Kids Need Clean Air. Family & Community Health. 24(4). 9–26. 15 indexed citations
19.
Dixon, Jane, et al.. (1993). Energy as a central factor in the self-assessment of health. Advances in Nursing Science. 15(4). 1–12. 14 indexed citations
20.
Dixon, Jane, et al.. (1992). A causal model of the way emotions intervene between creative intelligence and conventional skills. New Ideas in Psychology. 10(2). 233–251. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026