Janet E. Harker

1.2k citations
26 papers · 875 · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Janet E. Harker

26 papers receiving 713 citations

Peers

Janet E. Harker
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 139
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 271
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 269
  • Genetics 276
  • Insect Science 126
Replace A. S. Danilevskiĭ with:
A. S. Danilevskiĭ
R.D. Lewis New Zealand
Elfed Morgan United Kingdom
W. E. Bradshaw United States
C. M. Holzapfel United States
H. Precht Germany
B. Lofts Hong Kong
K. G. Adiyodi India
Miriam F. Bennett United States
Rachel Ben‐Shlomo Israel
Janet E. Harker relative to A. S. Danilevskiĭ A. S. Danilevskiĭ's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
A. S. Danilevskiĭ · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet E. Harker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet E. Harker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet E. Harker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet E. Harker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet E. Harker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet E. Harker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet E. Harker. The network helps show where Janet E. Harker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Janet E. Harker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet E. Harker Line = papers co-authored together Janet E. Harker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1958128
2 1956117
3 196587
4 196562
5 196051
6 195442
7 195339
8 195335
9 196030
10 197730
11 196028
12 195228
13 195825
14 196025
15 196124
16 195422
17 199721
18 196519
19 195518
20 199216

About Janet E. Harker

Janet E. Harker is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 26 papers that have together received 875 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (4 papers), Insects and Parasite Interactions (4 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (4 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (4 papers) and Insect Utilization and Effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (139 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (271 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (269 citations), Genetics (276 citations) and Insect Science (126 citations). Janet E. Harker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Kazakhstan. Frequent co-authors include Philip S. Corbet, R. H. J. Brown, J. E. Treherne, William A. Foster, K. H. Mann and D.E. Kimmins. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Biology, Journal of Animal Ecology, Nature, Journal of Zoology and Freshwater Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact