Janet DuBois
- Co-authors
- Mary Jo GoolsbyGurpreet S. AhluwaliaDavid R. BerkSteven KempersZoé Kececioglu DraelosPamela G. ReedPhilip WerschlerMatthew C. Somerville
- Topics
- Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects (7 papers)Skin Protection and Aging (7 papers)Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyScience AdvancesJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Janet DuBois
28 papers receiving 239 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Dermatology 145
- Epidemiology 64
- Oncology 40
- Physiology 36
- Immunology 35
Countries citing papers authored by Janet DuBois
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet DuBois's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet DuBois with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet DuBois more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet DuBois
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet DuBois. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet DuBois. The network helps show where Janet DuBois may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet DuBois
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet DuBois. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet DuBois based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet DuBois. Janet DuBois is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Oxymetazoline Cream Following Topical Facial Administration for the Treatment of Erythema Associated With Rosacea. | 7 |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | Characteristics of Nurse Practitioners in Independent Practice in a Practice Restricted State | 2 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Janet DuBois
Janet DuBois is a scholar working on Dermatology, Leadership and Management and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 30 papers that have together received 244 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects (7 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (7 papers) and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (145 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations) and Research and Theory (3 citations). Janet DuBois has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mary Jo Goolsby, Gurpreet S. Ahluwalia, David R. Berk, Steven Kempers, Zoé Kececioglu Draelos, Pamela G. Reed, Philip Werschler, Matthew C. Somerville, Robert Bissonnette and Jane Fang. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Science Advances and Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.