Jane Shewan

718 total citations
20 papers, 486 citations indexed

About

Jane Shewan is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medicine and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Shewan has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 486 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 7 papers in Emergency Medicine and 5 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Jane Shewan's work include Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (5 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers). Jane Shewan is often cited by papers focused on Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (5 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers). Jane Shewan collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Jane Shewan's co-authors include Suzanne Mason, Andrew Weyman, A Niroshan Siriwardena, Maxine Johnson, Enid Hirst, Janette Turner, Tom Quinn, Rachel O’Hara, Jon M Dickson and Richard A. Grünewald and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Intensive Care Medicine and BMC Medical Research Methodology.

In The Last Decade

Jane Shewan

20 papers receiving 471 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Shewan United Kingdom 12 164 120 90 84 68 20 486
J Sullivan United States 8 208 1.3× 87 0.7× 63 0.7× 115 1.4× 34 0.5× 8 624
Carmel Crock Australia 12 57 0.3× 144 1.2× 117 1.3× 92 1.1× 37 0.5× 30 495
Megan Cox Australia 11 167 1.0× 201 1.7× 62 0.7× 100 1.2× 17 0.3× 30 495
Marc S. Nelson United States 13 104 0.6× 143 1.2× 181 2.0× 31 0.4× 21 0.3× 25 444
Lori Rutman United States 13 144 0.9× 106 0.9× 34 0.4× 41 0.5× 18 0.3× 39 360
Anand Kartha Qatar 10 100 0.6× 130 1.1× 36 0.4× 31 0.4× 15 0.2× 25 426
Mirjam Harmsen Netherlands 12 48 0.3× 328 2.7× 122 1.4× 62 0.7× 34 0.5× 22 605
Christine Wilson Australia 12 42 0.3× 130 1.1× 54 0.6× 73 0.9× 14 0.2× 21 466
Suzanne Winter United States 15 41 0.3× 155 1.3× 112 1.2× 76 0.9× 25 0.4× 37 577
Lekshmi Santhosh United States 13 64 0.4× 99 0.8× 220 2.4× 58 0.7× 37 0.5× 59 530

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Shewan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Shewan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Shewan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Shewan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Shewan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Shewan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Shewan. The network helps show where Jane Shewan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Shewan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Shewan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Shewan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Shewan. Jane Shewan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Johnson, Maxine, Rachel O’Hara, Enid Hirst, et al.. (2017). Multiple triangulation and collaborative research using qualitative methods to explore decision making in pre-hospital emergency care. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 17(1). 11–11. 51 indexed citations
3.
Dickson, Jon M, et al.. (2017). Cross-sectional study of the hospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC2). BMJ Open. 7(7). e015696–e015696. 31 indexed citations
4.
Lecky, Fiona, W. Russell, Gordon Fuller, et al.. (2016). The Head Injury Transportation Straight to Neurosurgery (HITS-NS) randomised trial: a feasibility study. Health Technology Assessment. 20(1). 1–198. 17 indexed citations
5.
Dickson, Jon M, et al.. (2016). Cross-sectional study of the prehospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC1). BMJ Open. 6(2). e010573–e010573. 51 indexed citations
6.
O’Hara, Rachel, Maxine Johnson, Enid Hirst, et al.. (2015). DECISION MAKING AND SAFETY IN AMBULANCE SERVICE TRANSITIONS. Emergency Medicine Journal. 32(5). e2.1–e2. 3 indexed citations
7.
O’Hara, Rachel, Maxine Johnson, Enid Hirst, et al.. (2014). Manchester Patient Safety Framework: ambulance. 1 indexed citations
8.
O’Hara, Rachel, Maxine Johnson, A Niroshan Siriwardena, et al.. (2014). A qualitative study of systemic influences on paramedic decision making: care transitions and patient safety. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 20(1_suppl). 45–53. 109 indexed citations
9.
O’Hara, Rachel, Maxine Johnson, Enid Hirst, et al.. (2014). A qualitative study of decision-making and safety in ambulance service transitions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(56). 1–138. 31 indexed citations
10.
Roberts, Nicola, et al.. (2010). A Pilot Study of the Impact of NHS Patient Transportation on Older People with Dementia. International Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 2010. 1–9. 8 indexed citations
11.
Lacey, E. Anne, et al.. (2004). Towards the development of a tool to assess educational needs in patients with arthritis. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing. 8(2). 111–117. 35 indexed citations
12.
McDonnell, Ann, Sue Davies, Jordan A. Brown, & Jane Shewan. (2001). Practice nurses and the prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke: the extent of evidence-based practice. Primary Health Care Research & Development. 2(3). 159–166. 2 indexed citations
13.
Hanson, Elizabeth, et al.. (2000). Supporting family carers using interative multimedia. British Journal of Nursing. 9(11). 713–719. 12 indexed citations
14.
Shewan, Jane, et al.. (1999). Factors in effectiveness:practice nurses, health promotion and cardiovascular disease. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing. 3(2). 58–65. 10 indexed citations
15.
Shewan, Jane & Stephanie H. Read. (1999). Changing roles in nursing: a literature review of influences and innovations. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing. 3(2). 75–82. 20 indexed citations
16.
Gowardman, John, Carmel Montgomery, Jane Shewan, et al.. (1998). Central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections: an analysis of incidence and risk factors in a cohort of 400 patients. Intensive Care Medicine. 24(10). 1034–1039. 51 indexed citations
17.
McDonnell, Ann, et al.. (1997). A detailed investigation of factors associated with the implementation of research-based knowledge by practice nurses in the prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke: final report to NHS Executive R and D Programme (Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke). Research Online (University of Wollongong). A1, A18–A1, A18. 1 indexed citations
18.
19.
Crookes, Patrick A, Sue Davies, Ann McDonnell, & Jane Shewan. (1997). Practice nurses and theprevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke: a literature review to promote evidence-based practice. Part II: hypertension, raised blood cholesterol, lack of exercise and obesity. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing. 1(4). 198–205. 3 indexed citations
20.
Gray, Trevor, et al.. (1994). Acanthamoeba keratitis: a sobering case and a promising new treatment. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology. 22(1). 73–76. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026