Jane Saiers

1.4k citations
21 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Saiers

21 papers receiving 940 citations

Peers

Jane Saiers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 771
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 511
  • Medical Terminology 5
  • Physiology 412
  • Sensory Systems 68
Replace Sagar Munjal with:
Sagar Munjal United States
William Jeptha Davenport Canada
Roger Deaton United States
Pamela S. Barrett United States
Heikki Hakkarainen Finland
Jan‐Peter Jansen Germany
Darcy Vavrek United States
Michael A. Ueberall Germany
R Oelkers Germany
Donald Newgreen United Kingdom
Jane Saiers relative to Sagar Munjal United States Sagar Munjal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Sagar Munjal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Saiers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Saiers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Saiers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Saiers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Saiers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Saiers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Saiers. The network helps show where Jane Saiers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Saiers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Saiers Line = papers co-authored together Jane Saiers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201313
2 20134
3 201316
4 201236
5 20124
6 201260
7 201145
8 201043
9 201025
10 200973
11 2004272
12 20031
13 200213
14 200094
15 200049
16
A double-blind placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy and tolerability of 50 mg sumatriptan tablets in the acute treatment of migraine. Sumatriptan Tablets S2CM07 Study Group.
199912
17 199941
18 199826
19 199825
20 1996109

About Jane Saiers

Jane Saiers is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Sensory Systems, Physiology, Family Practice and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (14 papers), Sympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments (10 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (5 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (4 papers), Neurological Complications and Syndromes (3 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (3 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (3 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (771 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (511 citations), Medical Terminology (5 citations), Physiology (412 citations) and Sensory Systems (68 citations). Jane Saiers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Alan H. Hall, Wayne D. Rosamond, Donna Gutterman, Richard B. Lipton, R Salonen, Stephen D. Silberstein, Anand A. Dalal, K.M.A. Welch, Peter H. Stone and Frédéric J. Baud. Their work appears in journals such as Cephalalgia, Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain, International Journal of COPD, Epilepsy & Behavior and Journal of Asthma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026