Jane Prophet

934 total citations · 1 hit paper
16 papers, 564 citations indexed

About

Jane Prophet is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Prophet has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 564 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Visual Arts and Performing Arts, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Jane Prophet's work include Art, Technology, and Culture (6 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers) and Design Education and Practice (2 papers). Jane Prophet is often cited by papers focused on Art, Technology, and Culture (6 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers) and Design Education and Practice (2 papers). Jane Prophet collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and United States. Jane Prophet's co-authors include Ayoung Suh, Helen Pritchard, Stephan Diehl, Paul A. Fishwick, Jonas Löwgren, Mark d’Inverno, Jon Bird, Yukari Nagai, Brian Magerko and Yong Ming Kow and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Leonardo and Artificial Life.

In The Last Decade

Jane Prophet

13 papers receiving 536 citations

Hit Papers

The state of immersive technology research: A literature ... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Prophet United Kingdom 6 342 181 84 75 73 16 564
Domitile Lourdeaux France 10 306 0.9× 108 0.6× 92 1.1× 51 0.7× 47 0.6× 28 659
Anind Dey United States 9 750 2.2× 130 0.7× 170 2.0× 71 0.9× 32 0.4× 13 1.0k
Sri Kurniawan United States 12 202 0.6× 85 0.5× 65 0.8× 33 0.4× 33 0.5× 25 617
Daniel S. McConnell United States 12 261 0.8× 88 0.5× 61 0.7× 95 1.3× 24 0.3× 41 615
Erik Nilsen United States 12 194 0.6× 57 0.3× 91 1.1× 34 0.5× 65 0.9× 23 489
Nico Pallamin France 7 247 0.7× 67 0.4× 144 1.7× 37 0.5× 93 1.3× 9 439
A.F. Newell United Kingdom 14 332 1.0× 103 0.6× 61 0.7× 27 0.4× 41 0.6× 48 824
Jessica R. Michaelis United States 6 205 0.6× 71 0.4× 48 0.6× 65 0.9× 22 0.3× 8 394
Tomi Heimonen Finland 15 267 0.8× 106 0.6× 52 0.6× 37 0.5× 26 0.4× 53 575
Xerxes P. Kotval United States 4 378 1.1× 153 0.8× 45 0.5× 39 0.5× 28 0.4× 7 751

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Prophet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Prophet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Prophet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Prophet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Prophet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Prophet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Prophet. The network helps show where Jane Prophet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Prophet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Prophet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Prophet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Prophet. Jane Prophet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Suh, Ayoung & Jane Prophet. (2018). The state of immersive technology research: A literature analysis. Computers in Human Behavior. 86. 77–90. 499 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Prophet, Jane, et al.. (2018). Small trees, big data. 1–2. 2 indexed citations
4.
Prophet, Jane. (2015). (Projection) mapping the brain. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2. 1–5. 2 indexed citations
5.
Prophet, Jane & Helen Pritchard. (2015). Performative Apparatus and Diffractive Practices: An Account of Artificial Life Art. Artificial Life. 21(3). 332–343. 10 indexed citations
6.
Prophet, Jane. (2011). El artista en el laboratorio: una cooperación razonablemente traicionera. O2 - Repositori Institucional (Universitat Oberta de Catalunya). 39–44.
7.
Goel, Ashok K., et al.. (2011). Proceedings of the 8th ACM conference on Creativity and cognition. Creativity and Cognition. 6 indexed citations
8.
Prophet, Jane. (2011). Model Ideas: From Stem Cell Simulation to Floating Art Work. Leonardo. 44(3). 262–263. 2 indexed citations
9.
Prophet, Jane. (2011). The artist in the laboratory: co-operating (t)reasonably. Artnodes. 0(11). 1 indexed citations
10.
Prophet, Jane. (2010). MODELS, MAQUETTES AND ART OBJECTS: MAKING DATA PHYSICAL. Electronic workshops in computing.
12.
Bird, Jon, Mark d’Inverno, & Jane Prophet. (2007). Net Work: an interactive artwork designed using an interdisciplinary performative approach. Digital Creativity. 18(1). 11–23. 5 indexed citations
13.
Fishwick, Paul A., Stephan Diehl, Jane Prophet, & Jonas Löwgren. (2005). Perspectives on Aesthetic Computing. Leonardo. 38(2). 133–141. 14 indexed citations
14.
Prophet, Jane. (2004). Re-addressing practice-based research: funding and recognition. Digital Creativity. 15(1). 2–7. 2 indexed citations
15.
Prophet, Jane. (2001). TechnoSphere: “Real” Time, “Artificial” Life. Leonardo. 34(4). 309–312. 9 indexed citations
16.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026