Jane Murray
Impact in
- Equine top 0.2%
- Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Papers in
- Genetics 42
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies 40
-
- Veterinary Medicine and Surgery 17
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 13
- Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology 6
- Co-authors
- Tim Gruffydd-Jones (7 shared papers)Rachel A. Casey (26 shared papers)Annamária Nagy (7 shared papers)Sue Dyson (7 shared papers)Margaret Roberts (4 shared papers)William J. Browne (3 shared papers)S. Love (1 shared paper)Cathy Wyse (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Veterinary Record (15 papers)Animals (10 papers)Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery (9 papers)Equine Veterinary Journal (6 papers)Preventive Veterinary Medicine (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jane Murray
64 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Equine 452
- Small Animals 527
- Virology 195
- Speech and Hearing 210
- Genetics 708
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Murray
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Murray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Murray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Murray more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Murray
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Murray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Murray. The network helps show where Jane Murray may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Murray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 153 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 83 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 70 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 69 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 69 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 63 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 63 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 52 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 46 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 46 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 41 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 41 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 38 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 35 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 28 |
About Jane Murray
Jane Murray is a scholar working on Genetics, Small Animals, Equine, Virology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (40 papers), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (17 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (15 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (13 papers), Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (9 papers), Rabies epidemiology and control (8 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (7 papers) and Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (452 citations), Small Animals (527 citations), Virology (195 citations), Speech and Hearing (210 citations) and Genetics (708 citations). Jane Murray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tim Gruffydd-Jones, Rachel A. Casey, Annamária Nagy, Sue Dyson, Margaret Roberts, William J. Browne, S. Love, Cathy Wyse, Timothy J. Gruffydd-Jones and E. R. Singer. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Record, Animals, Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, Equine Veterinary Journal and Preventive Veterinary Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.