Jane Mulcock
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Ecology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Topics
- Geographies of human-animal interactions (7 papers)Indigenous Studies and Ecology (4 papers)Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Jane Mulcock
20 papers receiving 325 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Sociology and Political Science 143
- Geography, Planning and Development 110
- Global and Planetary Change 62
- Ecology 58
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 41
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Mulcock
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Mulcock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Mulcock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Mulcock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Mulcock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Mulcock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Mulcock. The network helps show where Jane Mulcock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Mulcock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Mulcock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Mulcock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Mulcock. Jane Mulcock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | Review of 'Contemporary art and anthropology' | 2 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 86 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 'Welcome to my Dreaming Place': Landscape, Identity and Settler Belonging in Contemporary Australia | 1 |
| 7 | Culture as concept and influence in environmental research and management | 43 |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | Not Quite at Home: Field Envy and New Age Ethnographic Dis-ease | 2 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | Anthropologists in the Field: Cases in Participant Observation | 88 |
| 13 | Introduction: Awkward Spaces, Productive Places | 20 |
| 14 | The salinity crisis: landscapes, communities and politics. Updated edition. | 5 |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | (Re)Discovering Our Indigenous Selves: The Nostalgic Appeal of Native Americans and Other Generic Indigenes | 6 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | The salinity crisis | 14 |
| 20 | 15 |
About Jane Mulcock
Jane Mulcock is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Health and Anthropology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geographies of human-animal interactions (7 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (4 papers) and Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (110 citations), Anthropology (40 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (41 citations). Jane Mulcock has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include David Trigger, Lynne Hume, Andrea Gaynor, Lesley Head and Quentin Beresford. Their work appears in journals such as Geoforum, Society & Natural Resources and Conservation and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.