Jane M. Carrington
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Health Information Management top 0.5%
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects top 0.5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Susan M. RenzTerry A. BadgerSheila M. GephartJudith A. EffkenChristine W. NibbelinkElizabeth A. JohnsonVictoria L. TiasePaul Cook
- Topics
- Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (25 papers)Electronic Health Records Systems (24 papers)Patient Safety and Medication Errors (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane M. Carrington
48 papers receiving 839 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- General Health Professions 266
- Health Information Management 227
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 201
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 167
- Clinical Psychology 89
Countries citing papers authored by Jane M. Carrington
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane M. Carrington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane M. Carrington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane M. Carrington more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane M. Carrington
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane M. Carrington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane M. Carrington. The network helps show where Jane M. Carrington may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane M. Carrington
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane M. Carrington. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane M. Carrington based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane M. Carrington. Jane M. Carrington is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 81 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 21 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 53 |
About Jane M. Carrington
Jane M. Carrington is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Health Information Management and Research and Theory, having authored 55 papers that have together received 900 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (25 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (24 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (201 citations), Health Information Management (227 citations) and Research and Theory (27 citations). Jane M. Carrington has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Susan M. Renz, Terry A. Badger, Sheila M. Gephart, Judith A. Effken, Christine W. Nibbelink, Elizabeth A. Johnson, Victoria L. Tiase, Paul Cook, Sarah J. Schmiege and Lucy Bradley‐Springer. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Health Research, Nursing Research and International Journal of Medical Informatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.