Jane L. Wong
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter M. GutierrezStacey FreedenthalAugustine OsmanGregorio LozanoCourtney L. BaggeGeorge P. PrigatanoFernando A. BarriosChad T. Wetterneck
- Topics
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers)
- Journals
- Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationJournal of Clinical PsychologyJournal of Personality Assessment
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Jane L. Wong
23 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Clinical Psychology 593
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 240
- Social Psychology 225
- Epidemiology 210
- Psychiatry and Mental health 178
Countries citing papers authored by Jane L. Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane L. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane L. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane L. Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane L. Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane L. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane L. Wong. The network helps show where Jane L. Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane L. Wong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane L. Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane L. Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane L. Wong. Jane L. Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales—21 (DASS‐21): Further Examination of Dimensions, Scale Reliability, and Correlatesbreakdown → | 742 |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 69 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 93 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Jane L. Wong
Jane L. Wong is a scholar working on General Psychology, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (593 citations), Applied Psychology (99 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (240 citations). Jane L. Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter M. Gutierrez, Stacey Freedenthal, Augustine Osman, Gregorio Lozano, Courtney L. Bagge, George P. Prigatano, Fernando A. Barrios, Chad T. Wetterneck, Andrew R. Gilpin and Frank Barrios. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Journal of Clinical Psychology and Journal of Personality Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.