Gregorio Lozano
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter M. GutierrezAugustine OsmanJane L. WongStacey FreedenthalCourtney L. BaggeKimberly D. SmithQijuan FangFrank Barrios
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical PsychologyJournal of Personality AssessmentApplied Cognitive Psychology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Gregorio Lozano
5 papers receiving 875 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Clinical Psychology 548
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 248
- Social Psychology 198
- General Health Professions 124
- Psychiatry and Mental health 116
Countries citing papers authored by Gregorio Lozano
This map shows the geographic impact of Gregorio Lozano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gregorio Lozano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gregorio Lozano more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gregorio Lozano
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gregorio Lozano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gregorio Lozano. The network helps show where Gregorio Lozano may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gregorio Lozano
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gregorio Lozano. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gregorio Lozano based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gregorio Lozano. Gregorio Lozano is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales—21 (DASS‐21): Further Examination of Dimensions, Scale Reliability, and Correlatesbreakdown → | 742 |
| 2 | 30 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 94 | |
| 5 | 5 |
About Gregorio Lozano
Gregorio Lozano is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 893 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (548 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (248 citations) and Applied Psychology (90 citations). Gregorio Lozano has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter M. Gutierrez, Augustine Osman, Jane L. Wong, Stacey Freedenthal, Courtney L. Bagge, Kimberly D. Smith, Qijuan Fang, Frank Barrios, Sara Frı́as and Robert W. Fuhrman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Psychology, Journal of Personality Assessment and Applied Cognitive Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.