Jane Hoover‐Plow
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Hematology top 5%
- Immunology
- Co-authors
- Edward F. PlowLindsey A. MilesYanqing GongErika HartMenggui HuangThomas HerrenAlexander RedlitzEF Plow
- Topics
- Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (19 papers)Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (15 papers)Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (9 papers)
- Journals
- CirculationJournal of Clinical InvestigationSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceSpain
In The Last Decade
Jane Hoover‐Plow
51 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Cancer Research 518
- Surgery 443
- Molecular Biology 422
- Hematology 259
- Immunology 203
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Hoover‐Plow
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Hoover‐Plow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Hoover‐Plow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Hoover‐Plow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Hoover‐Plow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Hoover‐Plow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Hoover‐Plow. The network helps show where Jane Hoover‐Plow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Hoover‐Plow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Hoover‐Plow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Hoover‐Plow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Hoover‐Plow. Jane Hoover‐Plow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Abstract 17167: Targeting Apolipoprotein(a) With a Novel RNAi Delivery Platform as a Prophylactic Treatment to Reduce Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Individuals With Elevated Lipoprotein (a) | 7 |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 44 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 276 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 65 | |
| 13 | 53 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 41 | |
| 18 | 73 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | Postoperative plasma levels of free amino acids. | 1 |
About Jane Hoover‐Plow
Jane Hoover‐Plow is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Hematology and Immunology and Allergy, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms (19 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (15 papers) and Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (518 citations), Hematology (259 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (136 citations). Jane Hoover‐Plow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Edward F. Plow, Lindsey A. Miles, Yanqing Gong, Erika Hart, Menggui Huang, Thomas Herren, Alexander Redlitz, EF Plow, Yuehua Gong and Chang Wan Oh. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of Clinical Investigation and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.