Jane H. Bock

2.2k citations
56 papers · 1.5k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Jane H. Bock

54 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jane H. Bock
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 873
  • Ecological Modeling 215
  • Ecology 917
  • Global and Planetary Change 466
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 311
Replace R. Gerald Wright with:
R. Gerald Wright United States
Larry D. Harris United States
Fred B. Samson United States
Robert A. Askins United States
E. Charles Meslow United States
Matthew K. Chew United States
Mark R. Gardener Australia
Daniel W. Uresk United States
Thomas L. Fleischner United States
Michael Mühlenberg Germany
Jane H. Bock relative to R. Gerald Wright United States R. Gerald Wright's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
R. Gerald Wright · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane H. Bock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane H. Bock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane H. Bock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane H. Bock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane H. Bock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane H. Bock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane H. Bock. The network helps show where Jane H. Bock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane H. Bock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane H. Bock Line = papers co-authored together Jane H. Bock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006245
2 1984153
3 1992107
4 200786
5 199158
6 197850
7 198342
8 198940
9 200338
10 199238
11 196937
12 199037
13 199337
14 200835
15 199935
16 199328
17 197426
18 197426
19 199925
20 197824

About Jane H. Bock

Jane H. Bock is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (27 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (23 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (14 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (13 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (11 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (8 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (6 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (873 citations), Ecological Modeling (215 citations), Ecology (917 citations), Global and Planetary Change (466 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (311 citations). Jane H. Bock has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Carl E. Bock, Zach F. Jones, Michael C. Grant, Hobart M. Smith, Dave Foreman, Michael E. Soulé, Joël Berger, C. Josh Donlan, Felisa A. Smith and Gary W. Roemer. Their work appears in journals such as Conservation Biology, Ecology, BioScience, The American Naturalist and Journal of Wildlife Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact