Jane Griffiths

2.9k citations
91 papers · 1.6k indexed · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Griffiths

79 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Jane Griffiths
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 136
  • Family Practice 98
  • Research and Theory 35
  • General Health Professions 684
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 660
Replace Anne Mulhall with:
Anne Mulhall United Kingdom
Judith Haber United States
Isabel Amélia Costa Mendes Brazil
Ann Catrine Eldh Sweden
Ann‐Louise Caress United Kingdom
Catrin Evans United Kingdom
Carolyn Murdaugh United States
Abbas Heydari Iran
Stephen Maloney Australia
Valentina Bressan Italy
Jane Griffiths relative to Anne Mulhall United Kingdom Anne Mulhall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Anne Mulhall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Griffiths

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Griffiths more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Griffiths

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Griffiths. The network helps show where Jane Griffiths may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Griffiths, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Griffiths Line = papers co-authored together Jane Griffiths links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005173
2 2003118
3 2013106
4 201165
5 202162
6 200058
7 201153
8 201553
9 200151
10 201547
11 201543
12 201034
13 201533
14 199333
15 200732
16 202131
17 201230
18 200428
19 201928
20 201427

About Jane Griffiths

Jane Griffiths is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, Infectious Diseases and Oncology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (17 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (8 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (7 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (7 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (7 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (6 papers) and Family Support in Illness (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (136 citations), Family Practice (98 citations), Research and Theory (35 citations), General Health Professions (684 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (660 citations). Jane Griffiths has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Karen Schultz, Gail Ewing, Karen Luker, Rosamund Bryar, S. José Closs, Karen Kemp, Simon Campbell, Karina Lovell, Laura April McEwen and Margaret Rogers. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Nurse Education Today, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Palliative Medicine and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact