Jane F. Gardner

2.3k citations
35 papers · 434 indexed · h-index 10
Topics
Classical Studies and Legal History (14 papers)Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (8 papers)Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers)
Partner nations
United Kingdom

In The Last Decade

Jane F. Gardner

30 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

Jane F. Gardner
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Anthropology 209
  • Archeology 127
  • History 124
  • Sociology and Political Science 118
  • Religious studies 92
Replace Thomas A. J. McGinn with:
Thomas A. J. McGinn United States
Beryl Rawson Australia
Charles W. Hedrick United States
Bruce W. Frier United States
Elizabeth A. Castelli United States
David Daube United States
T. P. Wiseman United Kingdom
Mortimer Chambers United States
Ross Shepard Kraemer United States
W. H. C. Frend United Kingdom
Jane F. Gardner relative to Thomas A. J. McGinn United States Thomas A. J. McGinn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Thomas A. J. McGinn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane F. Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane F. Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane F. Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane F. Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane F. Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane F. Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane F. Gardner. The network helps show where Jane F. Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane F. Gardner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane F. Gardner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane F. Gardner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane F. Gardner. Jane F. Gardner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2
Nearest and dearest: liability to inheritance tax in Roman families
1
3 12
4 50
5
Hadrian and the social legacy of Augustus
2
6
Frauen im antiken Rom : Familie, Alltag, Recht
1
7
Gender-Role Assumptions in Roman Law
6
8 9
9
The Purpose of the Lex Fufia Caninia
6
10 0
11 1
12 85
13 3
14 1
15
Women in Roman law & society
13
16 75
17 10
18
Caesar: The conquest of Gaul
1
19 2
20
Consolatory Letters in Basil and Gregory Nazianzen
4

About Jane F. Gardner

Jane F. Gardner is a scholar working on History, Law and Anthropology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Studies and Legal History (14 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (8 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (209 citations), Religious studies (92 citations) and Classics (45 citations). Jane F. Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mary R. Lefkowitz, Thomas Wiedemann and Richard Saller. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Classical World and Phoenix.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026