Jane E. Moore
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmaceutical Science top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Joseph P. A. HarrityAndrew PlantMatthew HelmVéronique GouverneurRomain BéjotJérôme DeclerckLaurence CarrollMark York
- Topics
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (11 papers)Click Chemistry and Applications (6 papers)Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (6 papers)
- Journals
- Angewandte Chemie International EditionChemical CommunicationsThe Journal of Organic Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jane E. Moore
20 papers receiving 380 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Organic Chemistry 324
- Molecular Biology 112
- Pharmaceutical Science 79
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 59
- Materials Chemistry 15
Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Moore
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Moore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Moore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Moore. The network helps show where Jane E. Moore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane E. Moore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane E. Moore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane E. Moore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane E. Moore. Jane E. Moore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | The Mobility of Fluoride in Back-Arc Hydrothermal Systems | 2 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 55 | |
| 11 | 72 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 69 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Jane E. Moore
Jane E. Moore is a scholar working on Pharmaceutical Science, Organic Chemistry and Geology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (11 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (6 papers) and Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (79 citations), Organic Chemistry (324 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (59 citations). Jane E. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joseph P. A. Harrity, Andrew Plant, Matthew Helm, Véronique Gouverneur, Romain Béjot, Jérôme Declerck, Laurence Carroll, Mark York, Mark W. Davies and Christopher N. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Chemical Communications and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.