Jane Demmen

1.0k total citations
11 papers, 435 citations indexed

About

Jane Demmen is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics and Language and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Demmen has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 435 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 4 papers in Linguistics and Language and 4 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Jane Demmen's work include Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (4 papers) and Authorship Attribution and Profiling (3 papers). Jane Demmen is often cited by papers focused on Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (5 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (4 papers) and Authorship Attribution and Profiling (3 papers). Jane Demmen collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Israel and Spain. Jane Demmen's co-authors include Elena Semino, Zsófia Demjén, Andrew Hardie, Paul Rayson, Sheila Payne, Veronika Koller, Jonathan Culpeper, Dawn Archer, Ursula Lutzky and Scott Piao and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Applied Linguistics and Computer Speech & Language.

In The Last Decade

Jane Demmen

10 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Demmen United Kingdom 7 275 131 127 112 72 11 435
Rebecca Clift United Kingdom 12 408 1.5× 385 2.9× 687 5.4× 103 0.9× 75 1.0× 26 862
Chase Wesley Raymond United States 17 235 0.9× 246 1.9× 542 4.3× 58 0.5× 38 0.5× 45 642
Marja‐Leena Sorjonen Finland 11 387 1.4× 353 2.7× 794 6.3× 81 0.7× 56 0.8× 33 901
Reza Zabihi Iran 15 78 0.3× 133 1.0× 224 1.8× 75 0.7× 15 0.2× 49 600
Jakob Steensig Denmark 9 333 1.2× 316 2.4× 646 5.1× 70 0.6× 52 0.7× 22 746
Bryan B. Whaley United States 10 67 0.2× 38 0.3× 59 0.5× 156 1.4× 27 0.4× 20 321
José Portolés Lázaro Spain 8 64 0.2× 53 0.4× 404 3.2× 12 0.1× 106 1.5× 56 536
Mia Halonen Finland 6 77 0.3× 92 0.7× 225 1.8× 77 0.7× 16 0.2× 24 356
Elina Weiste Finland 11 78 0.3× 63 0.5× 240 1.9× 90 0.8× 22 0.3× 52 458
Andrea J. Vickery United States 9 36 0.1× 40 0.3× 39 0.3× 175 1.6× 11 0.2× 16 276

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Demmen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Demmen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Demmen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Demmen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Demmen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Demmen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Demmen. The network helps show where Jane Demmen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Demmen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Demmen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Demmen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Demmen. Jane Demmen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Demmen, Jane, et al.. (2022). Language matters: representations of ‘heart failure’ in English discourse—a large-scale linguistic study. Open Heart. 9(1). e001988–e001988. 1 indexed citations
2.
Culpeper, Jonathan, et al.. (2021). Supporting the corpus-based study of Shakespeare’s language: Enhancing a corpus of the First Folio. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 45(1). 37–86. 5 indexed citations
3.
Demmen, Jane. (2020). Issues and challenges in compiling a corpus of Early Modern English plays for comparison with those of William Shakespeare. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 44(1). 37–68. 7 indexed citations
4.
Archer, Dawn, et al.. (2020). Mapping the links between gender, status and genre in Shakespeare’s plays. Language and Literature International Journal of Stylistics. 29(3). 223–245. 6 indexed citations
6.
Piao, Scott, et al.. (2017). A time-sensitive historical thesaurus-based semantic tagger for deep semantic annotation. Computer Speech & Language. 46. 113–135. 12 indexed citations
7.
Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, & Jane Demmen. (2016). An Integrated Approach to Metaphor and Framing in Cognition, Discourse, and Practice, with an Application to Metaphors for Cancer. Applied Linguistics. amw028–amw028. 151 indexed citations
8.
Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, Jane Demmen, et al.. (2015). The online use of Violence and Journey metaphors by patients with cancer, as compared with health professionals: a mixed methods study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 7(1). 60–66. 159 indexed citations
9.
Demmen, Jane, Elena Semino, Zsófia Demjén, et al.. (2015). A computer-assisted study of the use of Violence metaphors for cancer and end of life by patients, family carers and health professionals. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 205–231. 58 indexed citations
10.
Lutzky, Ursula & Jane Demmen. (2013). Pray in Early Modern English drama. Journal of Historical Pragmatics. 14(2). 263–284. 4 indexed citations
11.
Culpeper, Jonathan & Jane Demmen. (2011). Nineteenth-century English politeness. Journal of Historical Pragmatics. 12(1-2). 49–81. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026