Jane D. Roberts
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Oncology
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Analytical Chemistry top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ralph C. DoughertyHarvey P. TannenbaumGuy R. NewellP. TealeRichard G. KayChris BartonEdward T. KrementzP. R. Brown
- Topics
- Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers)Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (3 papers)Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical OncologyAnalytical ChemistryJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Jane D. Roberts
23 papers receiving 648 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Spectroscopy 318
- Molecular Biology 201
- Oncology 83
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 80
- Analytical Chemistry 79
Countries citing papers authored by Jane D. Roberts
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane D. Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane D. Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane D. Roberts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane D. Roberts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane D. Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane D. Roberts. The network helps show where Jane D. Roberts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane D. Roberts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane D. Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane D. Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane D. Roberts. Jane D. Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 52 | |
| 5 | 137 | |
| 6 | Mass Spectrometric Data of Commonly Abused Amphetamines and Their Derivatives - Cross Contribution of Ion Intensity between the Analytes and Their Isotopically Labeled Analogs. | 3 |
| 7 | Phase Ib trial of bryostatin 1 in patients with refractory malignancies. | 46 |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 60 | |
| 13 | 101 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 40 | |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Jane D. Roberts
Jane D. Roberts is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Toxicology and Hematology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 745 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (3 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (318 citations), Analytical Chemistry (79 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (71 citations). Jane D. Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ralph C. Dougherty, Harvey P. Tannenbaum, Guy R. Newell, P. Teale, Richard G. Kay, Chris Barton, Edward T. Krementz, P. R. Brown, Colin S. Creaser and Francis J. Biros. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Analytical Chemistry and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.