Jane Castelli‐Haley

1.8k citations
45 papers · 1.4k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Castelli‐Haley

44 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Jane Castelli‐Haley
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Reproductive Medicine 561
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 439
  • Neurology 394
  • Family Practice 45
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 343
Replace Judith S. Brand with:
Judith S. Brand Sweden
Shari Clifton United States
Amanda Vincent Australia
Dagmar l’Allemand Switzerland
Cheng‐Che Shen Taiwan
Alessandro Finkelsztejn Brazil
Ekta Kapoor United States
Pınar Kadıoğlu Türkiye
Ewa Małecka‐Tendera Poland
Jérémie Lebrec Germany
Jane Castelli‐Haley relative to Judith S. Brand Sweden Judith S. Brand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.9×
Judith S. Brand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Castelli‐Haley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Castelli‐Haley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Castelli‐Haley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Castelli‐Haley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Castelli‐Haley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Castelli‐Haley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Castelli‐Haley. The network helps show where Jane Castelli‐Haley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Castelli‐Haley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Castelli‐Haley Line = papers co-authored together Jane Castelli‐Haley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005266
2 2017130
3 2017116
4 2018113
5 200790
6 201880
7 201270
8 201160
9 201755
10 201051
11 201842
12 201736
13 201136
14 200933
15 201033
16 200624
17 201324
18 200619
19 200918
20 201115

About Jane Castelli‐Haley

Jane Castelli‐Haley is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Reproductive Medicine, Neurology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (15 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (15 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (10 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (8 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (6 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (6 papers), Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (561 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (439 citations), Neurology (394 citations), Family Practice (45 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (343 citations). Jane Castelli‐Haley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ahmed M. Soliman, MerriKay Oleen-Burkey, Maureen J. Lage, Eric S. Surrey, Karin S. Coyne, Lucinda Orsini, Daniel M. Huse, Gregory Lenhart, Sean K. Kennedy and Kenneth P. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, Advances in Therapy, Journal of Medical Economics, Fertility and Sterility and Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact