Jane Campbell
- Education top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Safety Research top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael OliverIan A. HendryPeter BeresfordKenneth W. WarrenPeta TancredEileen K. Fry-BowersAmanda Fallin‐BennettRobert B. Stepto
- Topics
- Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (2 papers)Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers)American and British Literature Analysis (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jane Campbell
13 papers receiving 644 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Education 215
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 208
- Safety Research 173
- Sociology and Political Science 146
- General Health Professions 144
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Campbell
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Campbell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Campbell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Campbell. The network helps show where Jane Campbell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Campbell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Campbell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Campbell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Campbell. Jane Campbell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | Queer media images : LGBT perspectives | 2 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | Disability Politics: Understanding Our Past, Changing Our Future | 344 |
| 8 | 68 | |
| 9 | Room for Women: A Case Study in the Sociology of Organizations | 11 |
| 10 | Nora Foster Stovel, Margaret Drabble: Symbolic Moralist | 2 |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 274 | |
| 16 | 0 |
About Jane Campbell
Jane Campbell is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Literature and Literary Theory and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 16 papers that have together received 782 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (2 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (2 papers) and American and British Literature Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (173 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (23 citations) and Public Administration (59 citations). Jane Campbell has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Oliver, Ian A. Hendry, Peter Beresford, Kenneth W. Warren, Peta Tancred, Eileen K. Fry-Bowers, Amanda Fallin‐Bennett and Robert B. Stepto. Their work appears in journals such as Political Science Quarterly, Journal of Neurocytology and Disability & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.