Jane C. Feeley

551 total citations
8 papers, 460 citations indexed

About

Jane C. Feeley is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane C. Feeley has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 460 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Spectroscopy, 5 papers in Organic Chemistry and 4 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Jane C. Feeley's work include Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials (6 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (5 papers) and Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (4 papers). Jane C. Feeley is often cited by papers focused on Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials (6 papers), Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure (5 papers) and Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (4 papers). Jane C. Feeley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Australia. Jane C. Feeley's co-authors include Peter York, P. York, Ian M. Grimsey, Boris Y. Shekunov, Albert H.L. Chow, Henry H. Y. Tong, David Lechuga‐Ballesteros, Hak‐Kim Chan, Sally Lehrman and Andrew R. Clark and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Materials Science, International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Jane C. Feeley

8 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jane C. Feeley United Kingdom	7	197	169	156	132	93	8	460
Sarvajna Dwivedi Canada	12	265 1.3×	129 0.8×	99 0.6×	68 0.5×	87 0.9×	24	496
Srinivas Palakodaty India	9	118 0.6×	97 0.6×	86 0.6×	81 0.6×	84 0.9×	10	399
Patricia Darcy United Kingdom	11	70 0.4×	199 1.2×	149 1.0×	177 1.3×	224 2.4×	14	576
Päivi Harjunen Finland	11	157 0.8×	181 1.1×	59 0.4×	186 1.4×	81 0.9×	11	443
Jennifer C. Hooton United Kingdom	8	252 1.3×	113 0.7×	28 0.2×	119 0.9×	46 0.5×	9	365
Changning Guo United States	14	194 1.0×	89 0.5×	159 1.0×	46 0.3×	30 0.3×	26	504
Philippe Begat United Kingdom	5	381 1.9×	176 1.0×	31 0.2×	183 1.4×	37 0.4×	9	497
Eero Suihko Finland	12	48 0.2×	278 1.6×	59 0.4×	114 0.9×	104 1.1×	20	519
J. Kaerger United Kingdom	8	250 1.3×	155 0.9×	49 0.3×	163 1.2×	80 0.9×	12	478
Margaret D. Louey United States	9	458 2.3×	195 1.2×	31 0.2×	207 1.6×	33 0.4×	11	575

Countries citing papers authored by Jane C. Feeley

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane C. Feeley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane C. Feeley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane C. Feeley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane C. Feeley

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane C. Feeley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane C. Feeley. The network helps show where Jane C. Feeley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane C. Feeley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane C. Feeley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane C. Feeley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane C. Feeley. Jane C. Feeley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Chan, Hak‐Kim, Andrew R. Clark, Jane C. Feeley, et al.. (2004). Physical Stability of Salmon Calcitonin Spray-Dried Powders for Inhalation. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 93(3). 792–804. 82 indexed citations

Shekunov, Boris Y., Jane C. Feeley, Albert H.L. Chow, Henry H. Y. Tong, & Peter York. (2003). Aerosolisation behaviour of micronised and supercritically-processed powders. Journal of Aerosol Science. 34(5). 553–568. 70 indexed citations

Grimsey, Ian M., Jane C. Feeley, & Peter York. (2002). Analysis of the surface energy of pharmaceutical powders by inverse gas chromatography. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 91(2). 571–583. 104 indexed citations

Shekunov, Boris Y., Jane C. Feeley, Albert H.L. Chow, Henry H. Y. Tong, & Peter York. (2002). Physical Properties of Supercritically-Processed and Micronised Powders for Respiratory Drug Delivery. KONA Powder and Particle Journal. 20(0). 178–187. 22 indexed citations

Feeley, Jane C., et al.. (2002). Processing effects on the surface properties of α-lactose monohydrate assessed by inverse gas chromatography (IGC). Journal of Materials Science. 37(1). 217–222. 16 indexed citations

Shekunov, Boris Y., et al.. (2001). Physical properties and aerosol behaviour of salmeterol xinafoate. 2 indexed citations

Feeley, Jane C., et al.. (1998). Comparison of the surface properties of salbutamol sulphate prepared by micronization and a supercritical fluid technique. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 50(Supplement_9). 54–54. 9 indexed citations

Feeley, Jane C., et al.. (1998). Determination of surface properties and flow characteristics of salbutamol sulphate, before and after micronisation. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 172(1-2). 89–96. 155 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact