Jane C. Boulton
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Curtis L. BakerE. Leslie CameronRobert F. HessKathy T. MullenFrans A.J. VerstratenR.E. FredericksenRichard van WezelW. A. van de Grind
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (12 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceCellular and Molecular NeuroscienceComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Journals
- Vision ResearchJournal of the Optical Society of America AProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE
- Partner nations
- CanadaNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane C. Boulton
12 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Cognitive Neuroscience 334
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 112
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 63
- Epidemiology 50
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 43
Countries citing papers authored by Jane C. Boulton
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane C. Boulton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane C. Boulton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane C. Boulton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane C. Boulton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane C. Boulton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane C. Boulton. The network helps show where Jane C. Boulton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane C. Boulton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane C. Boulton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane C. Boulton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane C. Boulton. Jane C. Boulton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | 52 | |
| 7 | 77 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 35 |
About Jane C. Boulton
Jane C. Boulton is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 12 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (12 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (334 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (112 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (63 citations). Jane C. Boulton has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Curtis L. Baker, E. Leslie Cameron, Robert F. Hess, Kathy T. Mullen, Frans A.J. Verstraten, R.E. Fredericksen, Richard van Wezel and W. A. van de Grind. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Journal of the Optical Society of America A and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.