Jane Bates

1.3k citations
92 papers · 496 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Bates

69 papers receiving 472 citations

Peers

Jane Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Equine 16
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 56
  • Hepatology 28
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 85
  • Reproductive Medicine 19
Replace Marsha S. Anderson with:
Marsha S. Anderson United States
David Wiseman Canada
Jyotindu Debnath India
Katherine Li United States
Tracy Truong United States
Meileen Acosta United States
Rafael Rivera United States
Malcolm G. Freeman United States
Michelle Vichnin United States
Vineet Mishra India
Jane Bates relative to Marsha S. Anderson United States Marsha S. Anderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Marsha S. Anderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Bates. The network helps show where Jane Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Bates Line = papers co-authored together Jane Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200246
2 199636
3 201133
4 201132
5
Abdominal ultrasound : how, why and when
199930
6 201729
7 201226
8 202125
9 201825
10 201523
11 200920
12 201819
13 200611
14 198110
15 20119
16 20159
17 20198
18 20128
19 19828
20 20237

About Jane Bates

Jane Bates is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, General Health Professions, Epidemiology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 92 papers that have together received 496 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Esophageal and GI Pathology (3 papers), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (2 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (16 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (56 citations), Hepatology (28 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (85 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (19 citations). Jane Bates has collaborated with scholars based in Malawi, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lynne Rogerson, Sean Duffy, Louis Niessen, Nyengo Mkandawire, William J. Harrison, S. Bertel Squire, E.E. Noiles, Leo Masamba, Ewan Brown and Dermot Gorman. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Standard, Theriogenology, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact