Jane Barton
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Occupational Therapy top 2%
- Co-authors
- Simon FolkardEvelien SpeltenPeter TotterdellLawrence SmithGiovanni CostaPaul NormanCarlla S. SmithChet Robie
- Topics
- Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (14 papers)Workplace Health and Well-being (12 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Jane Barton
27 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 689
- General Health Professions 554
- Social Psychology 267
- Clinical Psychology 172
- Occupational Therapy 100
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Barton
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Barton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Barton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Barton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Barton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Barton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Barton. The network helps show where Jane Barton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Barton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Barton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Barton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Barton. Jane Barton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Following Childbirth: A Meta-Ethnography. | 1 |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | Voluntary Audits and Bank Failure: Do financial statement audits constrain excessive risk taking? | 2 |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 87 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 52 | |
| 8 | 54 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | Measurement properties of the Shiftwork Survey and Standard Shiftwork Index. | 17 |
| 11 | 66 | |
| 12 | 246 | |
| 13 | 104 | |
| 14 | 65 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 113 | |
| 18 | 76 | |
| 19 | 41 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About Jane Barton
Jane Barton is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Rehabilitation and General Health Professions, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (14 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (12 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (689 citations), Occupational Therapy (100 citations) and General Health Professions (554 citations). Jane Barton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Simon Folkard, Evelien Spelten, Peter Totterdell, Lawrence Smith, Giovanni Costa, Paul Norman, Paul Norman, Carlla S. Smith, Chet Robie and Ian Macdonald. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Behaviour Research and Therapy and SLEEP.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.