Jane A. McLaughlin

24 papers receiving 540 citations

Peers

Jane A. McLaughlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Clinical Biochemistry 127
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 11
  • Cell Biology 76
  • Aging 8
  • Molecular Biology 290
Replace Lin Tsai with:
Lin Tsai United States
Yair Porat Israel
Sachiko Takesuè Japan
Stephen Gene Sullivan United States
Ishrat Jahan Bangladesh
Wolfram H. Walker United States
José Gil‐Longo Spain
Patricia M. Sokolove United States
Kayoko Saiki Japan
L. Packer United States
Jane A. McLaughlin relative to Lin Tsai United States Lin Tsai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Lin Tsai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane A. McLaughlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane A. McLaughlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane A. McLaughlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane A. McLaughlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane A. McLaughlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane A. McLaughlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane A. McLaughlin. The network helps show where Jane A. McLaughlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jane A. McLaughlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane A. McLaughlin Line = papers co-authored together Jane A. McLaughlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1967151
2 198373
3 199361
4 196349
5 198043
6 196240
7 198430
8 197527
9 196122
10 198521
11 196318
12 196314
13 196714
14 196313
15 19728
16 20097
17 19914
18
Enzyme-Controlled Scavenging of Ascorbyl and 2,6-Dimethoxysemiquinone Free Radicals in Ehrlich Ascites Tumor Cells
19854
19 19554
20 19833

About Jane A. McLaughlin

Jane A. McLaughlin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Cell Biology, Physiology and Biophysics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Free Radicals and Antioxidants (6 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (3 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (3 papers), Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research (2 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (2 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (2 papers), Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress (2 papers) and Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (127 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (11 citations), Cell Biology (76 citations), Aging (8 citations) and Molecular Biology (290 citations). Jane A. McLaughlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Albert Szent‐Györgyi, Laszlo G. Együd, Ronald Pethig, Andrew F. Hegyeli, Peter R. C. Gascoyne, Andrew L. Miller, Richard A. Fluck, Lionel F. Jaffe, Irvin Isenberg and A. Szent-Györgyi. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Science, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, Journal of Cell Science and Biological Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact