Janan T. Eppig

61.8k total citations · 4 hit papers
109 papers, 37.4k citations indexed

About

Janan T. Eppig is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Janan T. Eppig has authored 109 papers receiving a total of 37.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 86 papers in Molecular Biology, 28 papers in Genetics and 9 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Janan T. Eppig's work include Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (39 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (37 papers) and Gene expression and cancer classification (28 papers). Janan T. Eppig is often cited by papers focused on Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (39 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (37 papers) and Gene expression and cancer classification (28 papers). Janan T. Eppig collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Janan T. Eppig's co-authors include Joel E. Richardson, Judith A. Blake, Martin Ringwald, David P. Hill, Allan Peter Davis, H. Butler, Laurie Issel‐Tarver, David Botstein, Andrew Kasarskis and Selina S. Dwight and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Nucleic Acids Research.

In The Last Decade

Janan T. Eppig

108 papers receiving 36.7k citations

Hit Papers

Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology 1994 2026 2004 2015 2000 2000 2001 1994 10.0k 20.0k 30.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Janan T. Eppig United States 42 26.6k 5.9k 3.9k 3.8k 2.8k 109 37.4k
Judith A. Blake United States 48 26.4k 1.0× 4.9k 0.8× 3.7k 1.0× 3.7k 1.0× 2.7k 1.0× 137 36.9k
J. Michael Cherry United States 35 29.4k 1.1× 5.4k 0.9× 4.9k 1.3× 4.0k 1.1× 2.8k 1.0× 95 40.4k
Joel E. Richardson United States 35 24.3k 0.9× 4.6k 0.8× 3.6k 0.9× 3.5k 0.9× 2.6k 0.9× 81 34.7k
Catherine A. Ball United States 29 25.2k 0.9× 4.6k 0.8× 3.7k 0.9× 3.6k 1.0× 2.5k 0.9× 48 35.3k
Martin Ringwald United States 29 24.5k 0.9× 4.2k 0.7× 3.5k 0.9× 3.4k 0.9× 2.5k 0.9× 57 33.8k
David P. Hill United States 28 23.6k 0.9× 4.1k 0.7× 3.6k 0.9× 3.4k 0.9× 2.4k 0.9× 55 33.3k
Kara Dolinski United States 31 28.8k 1.1× 4.6k 0.8× 3.8k 1.0× 3.7k 1.0× 2.8k 1.0× 44 38.7k
Midori A. Harris United Kingdom 24 23.7k 0.9× 4.0k 0.7× 3.6k 0.9× 3.4k 0.9× 2.4k 0.9× 44 32.8k
Laurie Issel‐Tarver United States 9 22.2k 0.8× 4.1k 0.7× 3.4k 0.9× 3.3k 0.9× 2.3k 0.8× 11 31.3k
Selina S. Dwight United States 13 23.2k 0.9× 4.0k 0.7× 3.6k 0.9× 3.3k 0.9× 2.4k 0.8× 20 32.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Janan T. Eppig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janan T. Eppig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janan T. Eppig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janan T. Eppig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janan T. Eppig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janan T. Eppig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janan T. Eppig. The network helps show where Janan T. Eppig may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janan T. Eppig

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janan T. Eppig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janan T. Eppig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janan T. Eppig. Janan T. Eppig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Blake, Judith A., Janan T. Eppig, James A. Kadin, et al.. (2016). Mouse Genome Database (MGD)-2017: community knowledge resource for the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Research. 45(D1). D723–D729. 179 indexed citations
2.
Bult, Carol J., et al.. (2015). Mouse genome database 2016. Nucleic Acids Research. 44(D1). D840–D847. 80 indexed citations
3.
Smith, Cynthia L. & Janan T. Eppig. (2012). The Mammalian Phenotype Ontology as a unifying standard for experimental and high-throughput phenotyping data. Mammalian Genome. 23(9-10). 653–668. 115 indexed citations
4.
Bello, Susan M., Allan Peter Davis, Thomas C. Wiegers, et al.. (2011). Waiting for a Robust Disease Ontology: A Merger of OMIM and MeSH as a Practical Interim Solution.. 2 indexed citations
5.
Ramakrishnan, C. R., William A. Baumgartner, Judith A. Blake, et al.. (2010). Building the Scientific Knowledge Mine (SciKnowMine1): a Community-driven Framework for Text Mining Tools in Direct Service to Biocuration. Malta. Language Resources and Evaluation. 5 indexed citations
6.
Bult, Carol J., Judith A. Blake, James A. Kadin, et al.. (2007). P4-S The Mouse Genome Informatics Database: An Integrated Resource for Mouse Genetics and Genomics.. Journal of Biomolecular Techniques JBT. 18(1). 2–2. 2 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Constance M., Jacqueline H. Finger, Terry F. Hayamizu, et al.. (2006). The mouse Gene Expression Database (GXD): 2007 update. Nucleic Acids Research. 35(Database). D618–D623. 69 indexed citations
8.
Barker, Jane E., et al.. (2005). High incidence, early onset of histiocytic sarcomas in mice with Hertwig's anemia. Experimental Hematology. 33(10). 1118–1129. 6 indexed citations
9.
Strivens, Mark & Janan T. Eppig. (2004). Visualizing the Laboratory Mouse: Capturing Phenotype Information. Genetica. 122(1). 89–97. 14 indexed citations
10.
Näf, Dieter, Debra M. Krupke, John P. Sundberg, Janan T. Eppig, & Carol J. Bult. (2002). The Mouse Tumor Biology Database: a public resource for cancer genetics and pathology of the mouse.. The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory). 62(5). 1235–40. 40 indexed citations
11.
Hill, David P., Allan Peter Davis, Joel E. Richardson, et al.. (2001). PROGRAM DESCRIPTION. Genomics. 74(1). 121–128. 41 indexed citations
12.
Blake, Judith A., et al.. (1999). The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): genetic and genomic information about the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Research. 27(1). 95–98. 47 indexed citations
13.
Bult, Carol J., Debra M. Krupke, & Janan T. Eppig. (1999). Electronic access to mouse tumor data: the Mouse Tumor Biology Database (MTB) project. Nucleic Acids Research. 27(1). 99–105. 20 indexed citations
14.
Ringwald, Martin, et al.. (1999). GXD: a Gene Expression Database for the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Research. 27(1). 106–112. 34 indexed citations
15.
Davisson, Muriel T., et al.. (1998). The Mouse Gene Map. ILAR Journal. 39(2-3). 96–131. 10 indexed citations
16.
Stassen, Alphons P. M., Peter C. Groot, Janan T. Eppig, & Peter Démant. (1996). Genetic composition of the recombinant congenic strains. Mammalian Genome. 7(1). 55–58. 76 indexed citations
17.
Eppig, Janan T.. (1996). Comparative maps: adding pieces to the mammalian jigsaw puzzle. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 6(6). 723–730. 16 indexed citations
18.
Eppig, Janan T.. (1992). Mouse DNA clones and probes. Mammalian Genome. 3(6-7). 300–430. 2 indexed citations
19.
Abbott, Catherine M., Robert D. Blank, Janan T. Eppig, et al.. (1992). Mouse Chromosome 4. Mammalian Genome. 3(S1). S55–S64. 18 indexed citations
20.
Eppig, Janan T.. (1991). Mouse DNA clones and probes. Mammalian Genome. 1(S1). S332–S432. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026