Jana L. Schwartz

737 total citations
11 papers, 460 citations indexed

About

Jana L. Schwartz is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Sociology and Political Science and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Jana L. Schwartz has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 460 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in Jana L. Schwartz's work include Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers), Space Exploration and Technology (2 papers) and Space Satellite Systems and Control (2 papers). Jana L. Schwartz is often cited by papers focused on Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers), Space Exploration and Technology (2 papers) and Space Satellite Systems and Control (2 papers). Jana L. Schwartz collaborates with scholars based in United States. Jana L. Schwartz's co-authors include Mason A. Peck, Christopher D. Hall, Maria K. E. Lahman, Katrina L. Rodriguez, Monica Geist, Florence Guido‐DiBrito, Joshua Poore, David M. Krum, Nicholas K. Borer and G. Ricker and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics.

In The Last Decade

Jana L. Schwartz

10 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jana L. Schwartz United States 6 247 137 80 69 54 11 460
D.C. Carpenter United Kingdom 10 93 0.4× 101 0.7× 23 0.3× 9 0.1× 92 1.7× 27 385
William P. Delaney United States 10 144 0.6× 12 0.1× 39 0.5× 9 0.1× 5 0.1× 30 441
Lauren Blackwell Landon United States 9 69 0.3× 17 0.1× 24 0.3× 5 0.1× 13 0.2× 21 283
Hugo Santiago Sánchez United Kingdom 10 61 0.2× 32 0.2× 23 0.3× 135 2.0× 12 0.2× 35 300
Ying Zhong China 12 32 0.1× 4 0.0× 78 1.0× 18 0.3× 52 1.0× 42 420
Sachin Jain United States 8 79 0.3× 5 0.0× 27 0.3× 98 1.4× 27 0.5× 51 408
Cynthia Cheung United States 9 9 0.0× 24 0.2× 64 0.8× 10 0.1× 21 0.4× 32 300
Andreas L. Mogensen United Kingdom 8 50 0.2× 40 0.3× 28 0.3× 3 0.0× 13 0.2× 22 257
Nathan Lambert United States 6 24 0.1× 5 0.0× 16 0.2× 16 0.2× 13 0.2× 13 145

Countries citing papers authored by Jana L. Schwartz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jana L. Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jana L. Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jana L. Schwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jana L. Schwartz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jana L. Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jana L. Schwartz. The network helps show where Jana L. Schwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jana L. Schwartz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jana L. Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jana L. Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jana L. Schwartz. Jana L. Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Poore, Joshua, et al.. (2015). Modeling strategic use of human computer interfaces with novel hidden Markov models. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 919–919. 4 indexed citations
2.
Poore, Joshua, et al.. (2015). Operationalizing Engagement with Multimedia as User Coherence with Context. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing. 8(1). 95–107. 1 indexed citations
3.
Rodriguez, Katrina L., Jana L. Schwartz, Maria K. E. Lahman, & Monica Geist. (2011). Culturally Responsive Focus Groups: Reframing the Research Experience to Focus on Participants. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10(4). 400–417. 98 indexed citations
4.
Lahman, Maria K. E., et al.. (2011). Undocumented Research Participants: Ethics and Protection in a Time of Fear. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 33(3). 304–322. 39 indexed citations
5.
Borer, Nicholas K., et al.. (2009). A unified framework for capturing concept development methods. 41. 1–13. 2 indexed citations
6.
Borer, Nicholas K., et al.. (2009). Concept development of a multi-vehicle system for an operationally responsive mission. 41. 1–19. 2 indexed citations
7.
Schwartz, Jana L., et al.. (2009). Stories of Social Class: Self-Identified Mexican Male College Students Crack the Silence. Journal of college student development. 50(1). 50–66. 41 indexed citations
8.
Schwartz, Jana L., G. Ricker, R. Vanderspek, et al.. (2007). System Architecture for the Gamma-Ray Burst Dark Energy Mission (GDEM). Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 1 indexed citations
9.
Schwartz, Jana L., et al.. (2007). ALHAT System Architecture and Operational Concept. 1–13. 22 indexed citations
10.
Schwartz, Jana L., Mason A. Peck, & Christopher D. Hall. (2003). Historical Review of Air-Bearing Spacecraft Simulators. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics. 26(4). 513–522. 236 indexed citations
11.
Schwartz, Jana L., Mason A. Peck, & Christopher D. Hall. (2003). Historical Review of Air-Bearing Spacecraft Simulators. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics. 26(3). 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026