Jan Zaanen
About
In The Last Decade
Jan Zaanen
8 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Condensed Matter Physics 446
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 306
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 117
- Materials Chemistry 50
- Inorganic Chemistry 24
Countries citing papers authored by Jan Zaanen
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Zaanen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Zaanen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Zaanen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Zaanen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Zaanen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Zaanen. The network helps show where Jan Zaanen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Zaanen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Zaanen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Zaanen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Zaanen. Jan Zaanen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 78 | |
| 4 | 69 | |
| 5 | 220 | |
| 6 | 66 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 4 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.