Jan Wolff
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 5%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
Papers in
-
- Psychiatric care and mental health services 18
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 4
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 15
- Co-authors
- Claus Normann (15 shared papers)Klaus Kaier (11 shared papers)A. Klimke (12 shared papers)Paul McCrone (7 shared papers)Anita Patel (7 shared papers)Gudrun Hefner (8 shared papers)Sermin Toto (7 shared papers)Christoph Hiemke (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Neural Transmission (4 papers)PLoS ONE (4 papers)BMC Health Services Research (3 papers)BMC Psychiatry (2 papers)Der Nervenarzt (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jan Wolff
41 papers receiving 475 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 99
- Psychiatry and Mental health 168
- Clinical Psychology 163
- Family Practice 17
- Toxicology 23
Countries citing papers authored by Jan Wolff
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Wolff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Wolff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Wolff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Wolff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Wolff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Wolff. The network helps show where Jan Wolff may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Wolff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 42 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 38 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 25 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 9 |
About Jan Wolff
Jan Wolff is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Social Psychology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychiatric care and mental health services (18 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (15 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (10 papers), Health and Medical Studies (8 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (6 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (5 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (4 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (99 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (168 citations), Clinical Psychology (163 citations), Family Practice (17 citations) and Toxicology (23 citations). Jan Wolff has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Claus Normann, Klaus Kaier, A. Klimke, Paul McCrone, Anita Patel, Gudrun Hefner, Sermin Toto, Christoph Hiemke, Martin Wolkewitz and Thomas Berger. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neural Transmission, PLoS ONE, BMC Health Services Research, BMC Psychiatry and Der Nervenarzt.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.