Jan Shapiro
About
In The Last Decade
Jan Shapiro
7 papers receiving 356 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Epidemiology 168
- Infectious Diseases 154
- Small Animals 86
- Agronomy and Crop Science 71
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 63
Countries citing papers authored by Jan Shapiro
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Shapiro more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Shapiro
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Shapiro. The network helps show where Jan Shapiro may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Shapiro
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Shapiro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Shapiro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Shapiro. Jan Shapiro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Equid herpesvirus 9 (EHV-9) isolates from zebras in Ontario, Canada, 1989 to 2007. | 2 |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 44 | |
| 4 | 86 | |
| 5 | 66 | |
| 6 | 139 | |
| 7 | 24 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.