Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
THE HISTORY OF EMOTIONS: AN INTERVIEW WITH WILLIAM REDDY, BARBARA ROSENWEIN, AND PETER STEARNS
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Plamper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Plamper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Plamper more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Plamper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Plamper. The network helps show where Jan Plamper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Plamper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Plamper.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Plamper based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Plamper. Jan Plamper is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Plamper, Jan. (2023). We Are All Migrants. Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Frévert, Ute, Pascal Eitler, Margrit Pernau, et al.. (2014). Learning How to Feel: Children's Literature and the History of Emotional Socialization, 1870-1970. Research Online (Goldsmiths University of London).5 indexed citations
5.
Frévert, Ute, et al.. (2014). Learning how to feel : children's literature and emotional socialization, 1870-1970. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics.10 indexed citations
6.
Plamper, Jan. (2013). Vergangene Gefühle : Emotionen als historische Quellen. Goldsmiths (University of London).
7.
Plamper, Jan & Benjamin Lazier. (2012). Fear: Across the Disciplines. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics.21 indexed citations
8.
Plamper, Jan. (2012). Geschichte und Gefühl: Grundlagen der Emotionsgeschichte. Research Online (Goldsmiths University of London).4 indexed citations
Plamper, Jan. (2010). Wie schreibt man die Geschichte der Gefühle? William Reddy, Barbara Rosenwein und Peter Stearns im Gespräch mit Jan Plamper. Goldsmiths (University of London).
Plamper, Jan. (2010). Alchimija vlasti: Kul't Stalina v izobrazitel'nom iskusstve [Alchemy of power: The Stalin cult in the visual arts]. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society).1 indexed citations
13.
Plamper, Jan. (2010). Alkhimiia vlasti: Kul’t Stalina v izobrazitel’nom iskusstve. Research Online (Goldsmiths University of London).4 indexed citations
14.
Plamper, Jan, et al.. (2010). Rossiiskaja imperiia chuvstv : Podkhody k kul'turnoi istorii emotsii. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics.7 indexed citations
15.
Plamper, Jan. (2009). Emotional Turn? Feelings in Russian History and Culture. Introduction. Goldsmiths (University of London).5 indexed citations
Plamper, Jan, et al.. (2004). Personality Cults in Stalinism – Personenkulte im Stalinismus.6 indexed citations
19.
Plamper, Jan. (2004). Grenzgang in der Geschichte. Wissenschaftskulturen im internationalen Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft 52(10).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.