Jan de Boer

154 papers receiving 7.2k citations

Hit Papers

Studies in statistical mechanics196220261983200419622022200400600

Peers

Jan de Boer
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 4.9k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 3.7k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 3.1k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.6k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 722
Replace H. Osborn with:
H. Osborn United Kingdom
E. Brézin France
Neil Turok United States
Chen Ning Yang United States
Eric Braaten United States
Michael Nauenberg United States
R. Gatto Italy
John B. Kogut United States
Hubert Saleur United States
Yong-Shi Wu United States
Jan de Boer relative to H. Osborn United Kingdom H. Osborn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
H. Osborn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan de Boer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan de Boer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan de Boer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan de Boer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan de Boer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan de Boer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan de Boer. The network helps show where Jan de Boer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan de Boer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan de Boer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan de Boer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan de Boer. Jan de Boer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 16
3 24
4 2
5 6
6 2
7
15
8 10
9
Universality of sparse d > 2 conformal field theory at large N
14
10 32
11
Entanglement Holography
1
12 27
13 112
14
Apollonia Pontica 2007
1
15
The Cimmerian invasions in Anatolia and the earliest Greek colonies in the Black Sea area
2
16 82
17 6
18
Target space supersymmetric sigma model techniques
1
19 6
20
Extended conformal symmetry in non-critical string theory
4

About Jan de Boer

Jan de Boer is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Computational Mathematics, having authored 157 papers that have together received 7.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (100 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (71 papers) and Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (43 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (4.9k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (3.1k citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (3.7k citations). Jan de Boer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include G. E. Uhlenbeck, Vijay Balasubramanian, J. M. J. van Leeuwen, Erik Verlinde, Johan Groeneveld, Herman Verlinde, Djordje Minić, Hirosi Ooguri, Andrei Parnachev and Manuela Kulaxizi. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Physics Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026