James Williams

3.4k total citations
11 papers, 674 citations indexed

About

James Williams is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pharmaceutical Science and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, James Williams has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 674 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 3 papers in Pharmaceutical Science and 3 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in James Williams's work include Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers) and Crystallization and Solubility Studies (2 papers). James Williams is often cited by papers focused on Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers) and Crystallization and Solubility Studies (2 papers). James Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. James Williams's co-authors include Franck Chauvin, Joseph L. Pater, Yvon Cormier, Patricia A. Ganz, R. Cellerino, J. P. Bernard, J P Boissel, E Rapp, Élisabeth Quoix and P.-J. Souquet and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The American Journal of Cardiology.

In The Last Decade

James Williams

10 papers receiving 643 citations

Peers

James Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 364
  • Oncology 364
  • Pharmaceutical Science 146
  • Molecular Biology 94
  • Surgery 88
Replace Kasper van der Born with:
Kasper van der Born Netherlands
Ann Fioritto United States
Marcus Westerberg Sweden
Allyn L. Golub United States
Jenny Zheng United States
Anne Dubois France
Kyung Eob Choi United States
Dedrick Rl United States
Manuel Tubis United States
Emilia Sawicki Netherlands
Kasper van der Born Netherlands View profile →
Citations per field, relative to James Williams
James Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to James Williams
James Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by James Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Williams. The network helps show where James Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Williams. James Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 9
3 2
4 38
5 75
6 84
7 396
8 6
9 28
10
Comparison of electron paramagnetic resonance and atomic absorption serum copper measurements in human normal control and cancer patients.
3
11 33

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026