James W. Hinds
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 0.1%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Sensory Systems top 0.2%
- Neurology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Michael KaplanPatricia L. HindsNancy A. McNellyGregory M. ShoukimasChristine A. CurcioLeslie J. FisherDeborah W. VaughanAlan M. Fryday
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers)Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (11 papers)Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James W. Hinds
36 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.6k
- Developmental Neuroscience 2.2k
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
- Sensory Systems 1.3k
- Neurology 815
Countries citing papers authored by James W. Hinds
This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Hinds's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Hinds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Hinds more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Hinds
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Hinds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Hinds. The network helps show where James W. Hinds may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James W. Hinds
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James W. Hinds. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James W. Hinds based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James W. Hinds. James W. Hinds is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 155 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 213 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 33 | |
| 6 | 145 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 82 | |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 52 | |
| 11 | 240 | |
| 12 | 131 | |
| 13 | 158 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 58 | |
| 16 | 122 | |
| 17 | 100 | |
| 18 | 68 | |
| 19 | 236 | |
| 20 | Autoradiographic study of histogenesis in the mouse olfactory bulb I. Time of origin of neurons and neurogliabreakdown → | 449 |
About James W. Hinds
James W. Hinds is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Neurology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (11 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (2.2k citations), Sensory Systems (1.3k citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (2.6k citations). James W. Hinds has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Kaplan, Patricia L. Hinds, Nancy A. McNelly, Gregory M. Shoukimas, Christine A. Curcio, Leslie J. Fisher, Deborah W. Vaughan, Alan M. Fryday, Alison C. Dibble and Douglas A. Greene. Their work appears in journals such as Science, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.