James W. Hampton
- Hematology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Sue DavidsonGraham C. L. DaveyRichard PayneDavid GreenCampbell W. McMillanPeter H. LevineJan van EysLouis M. Aledort
- Topics
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (7 papers)Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers)Blood properties and coagulation (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
James W. Hampton
29 papers receiving 797 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Hematology 341
- Clinical Psychology 206
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 204
- Genetics 110
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 93
Countries citing papers authored by James W. Hampton
This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Hampton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Hampton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Hampton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Hampton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Hampton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Hampton. The network helps show where James W. Hampton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James W. Hampton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James W. Hampton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James W. Hampton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James W. Hampton. James W. Hampton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 84 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | Proceedings of the intercultural cancer council 6th biennial symposium on minorities, the medically underserved & cancer, Washington, DC, April 23-27, 1997 | 1 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 273 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 284 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About James W. Hampton
James W. Hampton is a scholar working on Hematology, Otorhinolaryngology and Genetics, having authored 30 papers that have together received 885 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (7 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers) and Blood properties and coagulation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hematology (341 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (204 citations) and Genetics (110 citations). James W. Hampton has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sue Davidson, Graham C. L. Davey, Richard Payne, David Green, Campbell W. McMillan, Peter H. Levine, Jan van Eys, Louis M. Aledort, Jack Lazerson and Margaret W. Hilgartner. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Circulation and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.