James W. Archie
- Genetics top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Paleontology top 2%
- Ecology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- F. James RohlfEdward A. LawsChris SimonAndrew MartinJoe FelsensteinDaniel WartenbergAndrew J. MartinOscar Flores‐Villela
- Topics
- Genetic diversity and population structure (9 papers)Amphibian and Reptile Biology (4 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers)
- Journals
- EcologyEvolutionMolecular Ecology
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilCanada
In The Last Decade
James W. Archie
28 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Genetics 599
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 519
- Paleontology 501
- Ecology 460
- Molecular Biology 363
Countries citing papers authored by James W. Archie
This map shows the geographic impact of James W. Archie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James W. Archie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James W. Archie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James W. Archie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James W. Archie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James W. Archie. The network helps show where James W. Archie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James W. Archie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James W. Archie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James W. Archie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James W. Archie. James W. Archie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | A review of phylogenetic hypotheses for lizards of the genus Sceloporus (Phrynosomatidae) : implications for ecological and evolutionary studies. Bulletin of the AMNH ; no. 213 | 19 |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 331 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 50 | |
| 12 | 113 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 129 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | A Comparison of Fourier Methods for the Description of Wing Shape in Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae)breakdown → | 441 |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 216 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About James W. Archie
James W. Archie is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Paleontology and Ecological Modeling, having authored 28 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (9 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (4 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (501 citations), Geometry and Topology (308 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (519 citations). James W. Archie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Canada. Frequent co-authors include F. James Rohlf, Edward A. Laws, Chris Simon, Andrew Martin, Joe Felsenstein, Daniel Wartenberg, Andrew J. Martin, Oscar Flores‐Villela, Charles J. Cole and Hampton L. Carson. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Evolution and Molecular Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.