Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Morphometrics in Evolutionary Biology.
1986512 citationsFred L. Bookstein, Barry Chernoff et al.profile →
Multivariate Discrimination by Shape in Relation to Size
1981398 citationsJulian M. Humphries, Fred L. Bookstein et al.Systematic Biologyprofile →
Paleoindian Cave Dwellers in the Amazon: The Peopling of the Americas
Countries citing papers authored by Barry Chernoff
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Barry Chernoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barry Chernoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barry Chernoff more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barry Chernoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barry Chernoff. The network helps show where Barry Chernoff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Barry Chernoff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Barry Chernoff.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Barry Chernoff based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Barry Chernoff. Barry Chernoff is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Chernoff, Barry, et al.. (2004). Spatial partitioning of fishes in the río Paraguay, Paraguay. Interciencia. 29(4). 183–192.6 indexed citations
9.
Machado‐Allison, Antonio, et al.. (2002). Identificación de áreas prioritarias de conservación en la cuenca del río Caura, Estado Bolívar, Venezuela. 22. 37–65.2 indexed citations
Chernoff, Barry, et al.. (2001). A biological assessment of the aquatic ecosystems of the upper Río Paraguay Basin, Alto Paraguay, Paraguay.7 indexed citations
12.
Machado‐Allison, Antonio, et al.. (2000). ICTIOFAUNA DE LA CUENCA DEL RÍO CUYUNÍ EN VENEZUELA. Interciencia. 25(1). 13–21.6 indexed citations
13.
Chernoff, Barry, et al.. (1999). Apareiodon orinocensis, una nueva especie de pez de agua dulce (Pisces: Characiformes: Parodontidae) proveniente de los ríos Caura y Orinoco, Venezuela. 19(1). 1–10.2 indexed citations
14.
Chernoff, Barry, et al.. (1997). Bryconops disruptus (Characiformes-Characidae), una nueva especie de pez de la cuenca del Río Negro en Brasil y Venezuela. 17(2). 67–75.1 indexed citations
15.
Chernoff, Barry, et al.. (1996). Bryconops humeralis y B. vibex, dos nuevas especies del género Bryconops Kner (1858) para Venezuela. 16(2). 42–58.1 indexed citations
16.
Buckup, Paulo Andreas, et al.. (1993). Las especies del genero bryconops kner , 1858 en venezuela ( teleostei . Characiformes ). 14(3). 1–20.5 indexed citations
17.
Chernoff, Barry, et al.. (1992). Peces del Río Atabapo. Territorio Federal Amazonas. Venezuela. 14(1). 41–55.1 indexed citations
Humphries, Julian M., Fred L. Bookstein, Barry Chernoff, et al.. (1981). Multivariate Discrimination by Shape in Relation to Size. Systematic Biology. 30(3). 291–308.398 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.