James van Howe

1.6k citations
37 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

James van Howe

33 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

James van Howe
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Biophysics 278
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 724
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 17
  • Structural Biology 26
  • Instrumentation 39
Replace Ian McMichael with:
Ian McMichael United States
Doron Meshulach Israel
Guillaume Labroille France
Avi Pe’er Israel
Tom Vettenburg United Kingdom
Jeffrey J. Field United States
H. I. C. Dalgarno United Kingdom
Antoine Monmayrant France
Thomas Juffmann Austria
Nobuyuki Hashimoto Japan
James van Howe relative to Ian McMichael United States Ian McMichael's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ian McMichael · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James van Howe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James van Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James van Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James van Howe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James van Howe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James van Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James van Howe. The network helps show where James van Howe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James van Howe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James van Howe Line = papers co-authored together James van Howe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005318
2 2008117
3 2005109
4 2006103
5 200573
6 201466
7 200463
8 200750
9 200738
10 200522
11 200720
12 202017
13 200617
14 200417
15 201716
16 202215
17 200515
18 201813
19 200412
20 201512

About James van Howe

James van Howe is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering and Biophysics, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (23 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (15 papers), Optical Network Technologies (14 papers), Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (11 papers), Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics (9 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (9 papers), Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing (4 papers) and Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (278 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (724 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (17 citations), Structural Biology (26 citations) and Instrumentation (39 citations). James van Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Chris Xu, Michael Durst, Warren R. Zipfel, Guanghao Zhu, Jennifer H. Lee, José Azaña, Jonás Hansryd, Reza Maram, Xiang Liu and Ming Li. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Letters, Optics Express, Journal of Lightwave Technology, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact