Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables
This map shows the geographic impact of James Tobin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Tobin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Tobin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Tobin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Tobin. The network helps show where James Tobin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Tobin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Tobin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Tobin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James Tobin. James Tobin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Tobin, James, S. Nowak, S.-W. Yu, et al.. (2023). Extraction of branching ratios from HERFD data. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena. 262. 147285–147285.1 indexed citations
7.
Duarte, Cláudia & James Tobin. (2008). A SECTORAL PERSPECTIVE ON NOMINAL AND REAL WAGE RIGIDITY IN PORTUGAL. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.4 indexed citations
8.
Tobin, James. (1997). Irving Fisher (1867-1947) in Retrospect: Fisher's Introductory Text. American Economic Review. 87(2). 430–432.1 indexed citations
9.
Tobin, James. (1996). Full Employment and Growth. Books.3 indexed citations
10.
Tobin, James. (1985). Neoclassical Theory in America: J. B. Clark and Fisher. American Economic Review. 75(6). 28–38.30 indexed citations
11.
Dolde, Walter & James Tobin. (1983). Mandatory Retirement Saving and Capital Formation. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 56–88.1 indexed citations
12.
Tobin, James. (1981). The Reagan economic plan--supply-side, budget and inflation. Econometric Reviews.2 indexed citations
13.
Tobin, James, et al.. (1980). 10年後の安定化政策(Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1980.1) (供給の経済学について). 69(10). 10–45.
14.
Nordhaus, William D. & James Tobin. (1976). Esta anticuado el crecimiento. 6(1). 349–375.1 indexed citations
15.
Tobin, James. (1975). Consumption and econometrics. Elsevier eBooks.2 indexed citations
16.
Tobin, James. (1975). La preferencia por la liquidez como comportamiento frente al riesgo. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 29–130.
17.
Tobin, James. (1973). The wage-price mechanism : overview of the conference.30 indexed citations
18.
Tobin, James. (1972). Technological Development and Employment. University of Nairobi Research Archive (University of Nairobi). 6(1). 1–26.
19.
Tobin, James. (1971). Essays in economics. North-Holland eBooks.46 indexed citations
20.
Sutton, Francis X., Seymour E. Harris, Carl Kaysen, & James Tobin. (1956). The American Business Creed. Harvard University Press eBooks.74 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.