Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Carbon dioxide reforming of methane with supported rhodium
1990440 citationsJames T. Richardson et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by James T. Richardson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James T. Richardson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James T. Richardson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James T. Richardson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James T. Richardson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James T. Richardson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James T. Richardson. The network helps show where James T. Richardson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James T. Richardson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James T. Richardson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James T. Richardson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James T. Richardson. James T. Richardson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Miller, Monica K., Monica K. Miller, Monica K. Miller, et al.. (2023). The Social Science of QAnon. Cambridge University Press eBooks.6 indexed citations
Richardson, James T., et al.. (2019). Litigation, liberty, and legitimation: the experience of the Church of Scientology in Australian law. Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO). 247. 62–81.1 indexed citations
5.
Woodhead, Linda, et al.. (2018). Portrait. 9(1). 1–23.1 indexed citations
6.
Richardson, James T., et al.. (2016). COMPUTERS IN THE SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES. 13(3). 101–104.
7.
Richardson, James T., et al.. (2013). Justice System Degree Programs at the University of Nevada, Reno. Justice System Journal. 26(2). 212.
8.
Dobbin, Shirley A., et al.. (2013). Federal and State Trial Judges on the Proffer and Presentation of Expert Evidence. Justice System Journal. 28(1). 1.
Miller, Monica K., et al.. (2009). Judges’ Perspectives on Stress\nand Safety in the Courtroom:\nAn Exploratory Study. Insecta mundi.2 indexed citations
12.
Richardson, James T., et al.. (2007). THE CONFLUENCE OF RESEARCH TRADITIONS ON TERRORISM AND RELIGION. A SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINATION. 39–55.2 indexed citations
13.
Richardson, James T.. (2004). Governmental reports on minority religions: an assessment. 87–96.1 indexed citations
14.
Richardson, James T.. (1996). "Brainwashing" Claims and Minority Religions Outside the United States: Cultural Diffusion of a Questionable Concept in the Legal Arena. Brigham Young University law review. 1996(4). 873–904.11 indexed citations
15.
Richardson, James T., et al.. (1995). Keeping Bad Science out of the Courtroom - Changes in American and Australian Expert Evidence Law. University of New South Wales law journal. 18(1). 108.11 indexed citations
16.
Kim, Karl, Lawrence H. Nitz, James T. Richardson, & Lei Li. (1994). ANALYZING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CRASH TYPES AND INJURIES IN MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISIONS IN HAWAII. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.26 indexed citations
Luss, Dan, et al.. (1989). Processing high-temperature superconductors. Chemical engineering progress. 85(9). 40–47.1 indexed citations
19.
Bromley, David G. & James T. Richardson. (1983). The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy : sociological, psychological, legal and historical perspectives. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).29 indexed citations
20.
Oliver, et al.. (1966). Techniques of production control.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.