James Scott
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 1%
- Development top 1%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Co-authors
- Rorden WilkinsonDavid HulmeMatthias vom HauT. J. PetersMark LanganRoger M. BattPaul RobackKathryn Ziegler‐Graham
- Topics
- International Development and Aid (15 papers)Global trade and economics (13 papers)World Trade Organization Law (11 papers)
- Cited by
- DevelopmentPolitical Science and International RelationsGeneral Economics, Econometrics and Finance
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNorth MacedoniaCanada
In The Last Decade
James Scott
47 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
- Sociology and Political Science 584
- Political Science and International Relations 528
- Development 198
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 145
- Global and Planetary Change 141
Countries citing papers authored by James Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of James Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Scott. The network helps show where James Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Scott. James Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | What Kind of Civil Society? Debating Trade at the WTO Public Forum | 1 |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | China and the WTO | 2 |
| 8 | The Politics and Perils of Plurilaterals | 11 |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | A Corean Manual: Or Phrase Book; With Introductory Grammar | 0 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failedbreakdown → | 1053 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | A Black/White Two Day Student Retreat: The Florida Model. | 0 |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About James Scott
James Scott is a scholar working on Development, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Development and Aid (15 papers), Global trade and economics (13 papers) and World Trade Organization Law (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (198 citations), Political Science and International Relations (528 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (145 citations). James Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, North Macedonia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rorden Wilkinson, David Hulme, Matthias vom Hau, T. J. Peters, Mark Langan, Roger M. Batt, Paul Roback, Kathryn Ziegler‐Graham, Sophie Harman and Julie Legler. Their work appears in journals such as Technometrics, Gut and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.